Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:41:48 +0800
Subject: Re: [D-G] explain please
From: Mr David Fussell <reception-AT-pica.org.au>
To: <deleuze-guattari-driftline.org-AT-lists.driftline.org>


The list's becoming has been halted by the deconceptualisation of the notion
of 'concept creation.' A too hasty line of flight?

D

> From: deleuze-guattari-driftline.org-request-AT-lists.driftline.org
> Reply-To: deleuze-guattari-driftline.org-AT-lists.driftline.org
> Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 12:05:49 -0800 (PST)
> To: deleuze-guattari-driftline.org-AT-lists.driftline.org
> Subject: Deleuze-guattari-driftline.org Digest, Vol 1, Issue 6
> 
> So this is the second deleuze-guattari list that I have joined just in
> time to see it fall apart?  Not enough for a pattern...not yet at
> least.  Does anyone have a point?  I have had poems sent to my inbox,
> which are interesting and could stimulate discussion; I have had some
> incoherent free-association pass my way, which also could be
> interesting; besides that, mostly banter, oh, and someone asking for
> etexts.  Do I have this straight?  People are criticizing someone for
> asking for texts?  Under the pretext that it is some sort of
> hierarchically driven authority loving captialist request?  What????
> Am I missing something?  (quite possible since I have only just
> arrived)  Is it: promote creative conceptualisation but let's not read
> the books that inspired that idea because they have come to represent
> the functioning of an overcoding regime?  Those of you criticizing:
> you have read Deleuze and Guattari, right?  Or did the ideas manifest
> in your head spontaneously?
> Now that would be intersting...
> 
> foris

_______________________________________________
List address: deleuze-guattari-AT-driftline.org
Admin interface: http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org