From: Sylvie Ruelle <sylvieruelle-AT-earthlink.net> Subject: Re: [D-G] Don't explain deleuze please Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 04:13:47 -0800 To: deleuze-guattari-driftline.org-AT-lists.driftline.org i like your uses of English so poetic On Nov 24, 2004, at 6:33 PM, adline vanlindenbergh wrote: > dg has been published and everybody can read it. copyes are circulating > on Niger river, on Amour River.. schizoline wanderrer across > continents, > have read dg and it did some good to them or NOT. lot's of questions > and > all time i wrote on dg spoon older list, it was i said the books like > what is philo has been published, and if even if the politic in this > book is very international, very futuristic, maybe only litterally it's > in an elite a becoming elite of ten singular (readers) who LOVE DESIRE > from the book. who use the book, and do not want to speak for it, to > explain away the written text. but what to act, produce something, to > deterritorialise (absoluteively) from it. becoming philosophy is one of > the objective set in this book. > > to me in that sense i had already fully agreed with guattari talking > about alternative subjectivity (alt.to for example occidental > mainstream > subjectivity )Universes Complexities will need ARTS more than > Philosophy. no need of philosophy books, read dg for philosophy, read > spinoza. the rest is disgusting. all the zyek badiou negri etc : no > sense, good but non-sense. we don't need intellectuals, we need > philosopher to become artists. > > dismantling the usa can be a political idea, and surely lot's of people > are already thinking about how to ashieve this. but only artist can > dismantle the usa, and the rest of the world. it's not only usa which > needs to be thought differently, it's the whole planet. only artists > have the solitude required for thinking and constructing a new earth. > it's a bifurcation from the intelletgentsia of what lies since > rennaissance which has to take break from the past. it means terrible > suffering, of which hunger is one of the slightest harm. (packs lines > turning to line of death, etc)try not be populist if you are honnest > about doing "good", or producing active affactios; because this is not > thinking to be a stone or a car or a factory: they are thinking objects > themselves.. what states man does not crave for this little thing: to > be > a thinker. what is needed is the virtual to come on the earth, and > this, > what is the virtual, and how can it become arrive on earth, is the task > of the thinker/ARTIST, only. the rest is paranoia, clubs networks, > squid > life. unhook from life and become a self that exists in the infinite > worlds, so you can start to think with desire (feelings). so go to your > typewriter and right a model. > -- > adline vanlindenbergh > bisouxnoursfast-AT-fastmail.fm > > _______________________________________________ > List address: deleuze-guattari-AT-driftline.org > Admin interface: > http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org > > Ms. Sylvie Ruelle http://home.earthlink.net/~sylvieruelle rw_artette_lc-AT-yahoo.com _______________________________________________ List address: deleuze-guattari-AT-driftline.org Admin interface: http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005