File deleuze-guattari/deleuze-guattari.0501, message 32

Subject: Re: [D-G] mona has
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:40:08 +0000


i tried to say the same thing a few months back and got the same old
string of semicoherent slippages. verlainelefou is right, reference to
texts and discussion isn't a capitalist/oppressor conspiracy... there
is a time to encode and a time to decipher, a time to sit down and do
sums and a time to pull the gnarly black lump from your soul. If we do
one without the other we run the risk of fleeing from constraint right
into a rather constraining paranoia which i'm sure D&G would have
thought just stupid.

Freeing your own mind is a laudible aim, but you should think about
coming back to the market place with bare feet and a smile on your
face now that the OX has obviously disappeared!

stuart tait

James Depew wrote:

> Still trying to fill the mustard pot?  I say break it OPEN.  
> Shouts and screams will never match that void.  Nor will desires. 
> Only one desire pushes at the limits.  Don't try to find it, it will
> find you.  The priest of repression you say?  Perhaps.  We have to
> find the darkness before making it empty.  A little song that is sung
> in the dark forest will soon open on to a prismatic spray, covering
> everything.  Just a single tiny note to build a symphony of colourful
> discord.
> Dont't try to harmonize.  Don't worry about me, I'm not you.  The
> darkness is no OTHER.  Only infinite space counting down to zero,
> impossibly.  The ten thousand rhythms will never be enough.
> Remember: without the freed slave shouting at you from the outside,
> you would only do what you're told.
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 07:30:25 +0000 (GMT),
> <> wrote:
> > 
> > Dearest Forest in the east is the priestof repression sounds like she got
yer number and its like finding the
> > 
> > voice in deleuze sans guattari c'est n'est pas possible.
> > 
> > Its all a creation and a becomings.
> > 
> > Dada
> > 
> > So this is the second deleuze-guattari list that I have joined just
intime to see it fall apart?  Not enough for a pattern...not yet atleast. 
Does anyone have a point?  I have had poems sent to my inbox,which are
interesting and could stimulate discussion; I have had someincoherent
free-association pass my way, which also could beinteresting; besides that,
mostly banter, oh, and someone asking foretexts.  Do I have this straight? 
People are criticizing someone forasking for texts?  Under the pretext that it
is some sort ofhierarchically driven authority loving captialist request? 
What???? Am I missing something?  (quite possible since I have only
justarrived)  Is it: promote creative conceptualisation but let's not readthe
books that inspired that idea because they have come to representthe
functioning of an overcoding regime?  Those of you criticizing:you have read
Deleuze and Guattari, right?  Or did the ideas manifestin your head
spontaneously?Now that would be
> >  intersting...foris
> > 
> > 
> > all  my words are on parole
> > 
> >
> > 
> > ---------------------------------
> >  ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!
> > _______________________________________________
> > List address:
> > Admin interface:
> >
> _______________________________________________
> List address:
> Admin interface:
List address:
Admin interface:


Driftline Main Page


Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005