Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:02:01 +0000 (GMT) From: Lucy LeGentilSinge <lucy100millionyearsold-AT-yahoo.co.uk> Subject: Re: [D-G] set theory and Badiou To: deleuze-guattari-driftline.org-AT-lists.driftline.org i have read a theorem by a mathematician called Euclid which was alive in old Greece quite a long time ago, Euclide who talked in his essays somwhere, abouthis idea that a prime number would never being the greatest of all of the existing prime numbers that we could fancy about. i thought at the point of study to the demonstration was quite examplary and more interesting than the thing itself as it was demonstrated by the symbols of Euclide. i was wondering if this can relate to your order of pairs of numbers in Badiou? i wish you could then develop suddenly the idea mathematically, schizophrenizing your relation to this list, so to start talking by mathematical sumbolos instead than overcoding all the time OPPOSITIONS (systematically bi-univocizing Badiou and Deleuze) between Badiou's and Deleuze/Guattari's works like the culturated neo-snobs that we are not of course. ___________________________________________________________ ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ List address: deleuze-guattari-AT-driftline.org Admin interface: http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005