Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 23:29:09 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: [D-G] to build by help, rhizome To: deleuze-guattari-driftline.org-AT-lists.driftline.org less meta-discourse? need to rhizome? --- "Dr. Harald Wenk" <hwenk-AT-web.de> wrote: > Hello, > > real good idea. But perhaps not to miuch > metadiuscorse (n+1). > > greetings > > Harald > > Am Sun, 24 Apr 2005 03:50:15 +0100 (BST) schrieb > Lucy LeGentilSinge > <lucy100millionyearsold-AT-yahoo.co.uk>: > > > > > > > > > - > > - > > - > > > > Merci Liza pour ta lettre d'hier soir. Adline est > > encore en voyage et elle n'aura probablement pas > pu > > répondre à ton courrier. > > > > Chèrs Ami, > > Dear Friends > > Cara Amigos > > Chaverim Tovim Sheli > > > > Nous, We, Nachnou, Anachnaou > > > > --Somebody beep and confirms me the Republic wants > me > > to talk in English. I am sure the Afraicans, the > > Eurasians, and the Micronesisans won't see this as > a > > capture of the Drift Line Politics -- > > > > it's just so I'll do that more easily with my > friends > > and not yet seen people subscribed in this place. > > > > Yes, the motif the motivation for my talk, for > today > > is the one: > > Can there be more debate on the list. Can > > subscriber talk about what they feel worthy of > > interest, that they would connect or not from > Deleuze > > and Guattari . So first 1) > > Can there be enough people who know of Deleuze and > > Guattari capable of actively interact does this > that > > is there, really making a sense as a relation > between > > you and me (i am saying this when the group is not > yet > > recognised by anybody else than me), but that I > can > > trust we won't get lost out of the maximum of > benefit > > we have enjoyed in the past of the list, from the > two > > authours, while, as it risqus being diminishing > now, > > and the fashion is waning, while the accademician > feel > > less concerned about the polemic side of Deleuze > and > > Guattari's book, so this world is starting to > vanish, > > and I was wondering if we could extend more > relations > > between Deleuze and Guattari, and re-ACT to this > > waning by infusing more relation of Deleuzian > > Guattari, or that belong to Universes of Value > with > > which they share Hyperboreales zones (cad zones of > > undisctinctions between first nature and second > > nature) and thus, well, I say this particularily > to my > > firend who is a very good supporter to me on this > > lists when I speak here, Stephano, and I say this > to > > you Stephano: I do not care about Ildegirsun > -AT-yahoo.no > > being from the North, I am from the South, and we > need > > such type of Belongings of that sort if we want to > > build the rhizome. What is important now the > rhizome > > that we want to build here as not yet existed. > > > > We want to build a rhizome. The connotation > explicit, > > Deleuze ATP Guattari, is less clear: all flyers of > > popular TV Parties in European American Trendy > Events > > are misusing the word rhizome and make some of us > > "malveillant" malevolent, do you want to be > > malevolent? no! so we will use it with > benevolition, > > the word, rhizome, is there for us, natural, > immanent. > > > > > > It's strange, I am not sure of the quality. Other > > matter should be said, they can now find a place > where > > here they will be said, and that's what I want to > do, > > see if others are likely enthusiast about these > > possibilities for new, non-deleuzian expression, > done > > with admiration for Deleuze. The project is not > > original of course? And it is. But what is not > > original is those people who claim a project needs > to > > be original. Rhizome!!! What shall we do then, > only > > rhizomes? > > > > For a while, I should say, until some start to > > disagree, we will gradually assume democratic > > decisions for the group according to a vote for > > changing Rhizome's characteristics. > > > > Because we are poet, we have the right to call > > whatever list on the internet the way it has been > > designed, Drift, we can for example Drift, we can, > > call this list: Rhizome. > > > > And remember how many readings of Rhizome will not > be > > competitive towards a real self-made thought, on > the > > rhizome plateau itself. > > > > So please, let's Rhizomise. > > > > Send instant messages to your online friends > > http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________ > > List address: deleuze-guattari-AT-driftline.org > > Info: > > > http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org > > Archives: www.driftline.org > > > > > > -- > Erstellt mit Operas revolutionärem E-Mail-Modul: > http://www.opera.com/m2/ > > _______________________________________________ > List address: deleuze-guattari-AT-driftline.org > Info: > http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org > Archives: www.driftline.org > Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ List address: deleuze-guattari-AT-driftline.org Info: http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org Archives: www.driftline.org
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005