Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:23:35 +0100 (BST) From: Gondo -Minnie <gondominnie-AT-yahoo.co.uk> To: deleuze-guattari-driftline.org-AT-lists.driftline.org Subject: [D-G] baby brain my baby brain wamts to explore your hypocampus. --- deleuze-guattari-driftline.org-bounces-AT-lists.driftline.org <gondominnie-AT-yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > put fold on lesbian brain and the viewer in the lab > will seek to fold floods of hurricanes absolute > nonsense connected with non fecund flows. change this > sign system by speeds shift in my brain baby!! > --- > deleuze-guattari-driftline.org-bounces-AT-lists.driftline.org > <pretzelworld-AT-gmail.com> wrote: > > the grammar is useful in many many ways. It is > useful to maintain a > > credible logos. Like an externalized socialized > hypocampus. Grammar is > > also super important to create for capitalists for > translating the > > "unknown" into logos to be used as rhetoric and the > power of the > > differend. Ideas like "the paperless office" have > found some weird > > credibility nowadays thanks to the grammar it > imposes upon the office > > work space. There is no "third-generation" really, > just cuz Brockman > > doesnt want to print out anything doesn't mean that > it dont get > > printed, it just gets printed elsewhere by someother > non-paperless > > office. To a certain extent Brockman was merely > passing the buck, and > > with the time & materal he was able to leach out of > this arrangement > > he was able to drive his competition out of the game > (power of the > > differend). The situation is not really so > different but the grammar > > makes it look new. But grammar is not the bad guy, > it is just that > > this case the leverage was behind Brockman's and the > grammar helped > > communicate this into the hypocampus of ignorant > office worker. > > So much of that contemporary electronic art is just > dressed up > > "detentionalism" (without intention, and it looks > like it was created > > by oppressed high school students in detention > class) This electronic > > detentionalism adopts the frail grammar of > conceptual art to basically > > sell consumer technology. Like selling millions of > hi-definition TV > > sets to those poor folks who didn't have the correct > resolution to see > > Janet Jackson's tiny nipple during the super-bowl. > What does that > > Afro-American nipple have to do with Japan's newest > Sony TV set? > > Nothing, but if I can convince myself of the > capitalist grammar that > > will connect these together then I will certainly > have something. But > > what is it without that grammar? It is a pretty sick > relationship. > > But unlike our own hypocampus which deals tens of > thousands of > > connections simultaneously, most grammar is pretty > sparse, as you say > > minimal, that's why grammar usually sucks so bad, > but we make up for > > it with our own minds which are much more robust. > That giant gap of > > Socrate's "unknown" is once again filled by personal > labor. Thinking > > is work, it burns calories. The capitalist does't > need to think he > > makes others do that work. > > In English, grammar is all we have left of thoth's > rebus, we have > > specialized cases I - you - we - he - she - they - > that is all we have > > in terms of perspectives standing on that giant > tree. Looking at the === Message Truncated === __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ List address: deleuze-guattari-AT-driftline.org Info: http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org Archives: www.driftline.org
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005