Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 02:19:20 +0100 (BST)
To: deleuze-guattari-driftline.org-AT-lists.driftline.org
Subject: [D-G] auto byo grafee


is it here i should publish my autobiography?
---
deleuze-guattari-driftline.org-bounces-AT-lists.driftline.org
<gondominnie-AT-yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> my baby brain wamts to explore your hypocampus.
> ---
>
deleuze-guattari-driftline.org-bounces-AT-lists.driftline.org
> <gondominnie-AT-yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > put fold on lesbian brain and the viewer in the
lab
> > will seek to fold floods of hurricanes absolute
> > nonsense connected with non fecund flows. change
> this
> > sign system by speeds shift in my brain baby!!
> > ---
> >
>
deleuze-guattari-driftline.org-bounces-AT-lists.driftline.org
> > <pretzelworld-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
> > > the grammar is useful in many many ways. It is
> > useful to maintain a
> > > credible logos. Like an externalized socialized
> > hypocampus. Grammar is
> > > also super important to create for capitalists
for
> > translating the
> > > "unknown" into logos to be used as rhetoric and
> the
> > power of the
> > > differend. Ideas like "the paperless office"
have
> > found some weird
> > > credibility nowadays thanks to the grammar it
> > imposes upon the office
> > > work space. There is no "third-generation"
really,
> > just cuz Brockman
> > > doesnt want to print out anything doesn't mean
> that
> > it dont get
> > > printed, it just gets printed elsewhere by
> someother
> > non-paperless
> > > office. To a certain extent Brockman was merely
> > passing the buck, and
> > > with the time & materal he was able to leach out
> of
> > this arrangement
> > > he was able to drive his competition out of the
> game
> > (power of the
> > > differend).  The situation is not really so
> > different but the grammar
> > > makes it look new. But grammar is not the bad
guy,
> > it is just that
> > > this case the leverage was behind Brockman's and
> the
> > grammar helped
> > > communicate this into the hypocampus of ignorant
> > office worker.
> > > So much of that contemporary electronic art is
> just
> > dressed up
> > > "detentionalism" (without intention, and it
looks
> > like it was created
> > > by oppressed high school students in detention
> > class) This electronic
> > > detentionalism adopts the frail grammar of
> > conceptual art to basically
> > > sell consumer technology. Like selling millions
of
> > hi-definition TV
> > > sets to those poor folks who didn't have the
> correct
> > resolution to see
> > > Janet Jackson's tiny nipple during the
super-bowl.
> > What does that
> > > Afro-American nipple have to do with Japan's
> newest
> > Sony TV set?
> > > Nothing, but if I can convince myself of the
> > capitalist grammar that
> > > will connect these together then I will
certainly
> > have something. But
> > > what is it without that grammar? It is a pretty
> sick
> > relationship.
> > > But unlike our own hypocampus which deals tens
of
> > thousands of
> > > connections simultaneously, most grammar is
pretty
=== Message Truncated === 



		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
List address: deleuze-guattari-AT-driftline.org
Info: http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
Archives: www.driftline.org