Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 22:57:32 +0000 (GMT) From: Gondo -Minnie <gondominnie-AT-yahoo.co.uk> To: deleuze-guattari-AT-lists.driftline.org Subject: Re: [D-G] deleuze and benjamin on violence hwenk <hwenk-AT-web.de> wrote: Hello, I am surprised that there seems no realistc view on scientific research and so much pressure to control it. Pressure by what or who? dear Collegue? Whhat do you think has science and technology brought about that should have better been not been invented. Microsoft technological capacity to seize the activity of people using computers, difficultity in learning open source but possibility I remark that the theory of atomism is so that building atomic bombs is very easy provided you have enough radioaktiv material. The state of science in the 1940ies has been very low compared to nowadays. let's not go in discussing weapons at the moment it scares me Most of inventions improve capitalism by improving daily live in making it more comfortable. I don't suspect anyone is willing to abolish most of this comfort. it's not about to abolish the comfort but to make sure it will be something lasting more than five days/years something where we have a view access on the condition of possibility of these scientifical creativity inventivity, access for all, rhizome not tree of sapiens You may know that also Althusser has written about that what he calls "The spontaneous ideolgy of scientiests". He meant something that science is pure and good in the eyes of the researches and the critics as Althussser say that they have to look to whom its serves what they are doing. Althuser is a marxist who professes believes in progress by se, which shows a kind of positivity nothing else very philosophical or open minded to science constructivism But thinking democratic in my eyes there is indeed mostly profits for all people and mostly also social problems need more and not less science or application of science to be solved. the question might be interesting to introduce there the notion of Royale Science and Locale Problems Archimedes way, and a capacity for the scientist not to stamp on fix ideas. fuck avodgadro and mendelev for a while then get back to it, but allow your mind to questions, what you propose here is the further push of sapiens, and TREE (binarity) - power. Deleuze and Guattari are full of references to most prominent and famous science at the time their books were written, especially sciences connected with structuralism. yet they thought what they science injected, they did not get inspired by the scientists paradigms, they critcised the paradigmalism of science in WIP? I have read Benajmins essay on Baudelaire long tinme ago, but I was more impressed as a lot of people here in germany by his essay on arts in times of the possibility techincal reproducing - emphazising the loss of o the "aura". sorrry --------------------------------- Win a BlackBerry device from O2 with Yahoo!. Enter now. _______________________________________________ List address: deleuze-guattari-AT-driftline.org Info: http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org Archives: www.driftline.org
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005