Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 22:58:48 -0400 From: NZ <pretzelworld-AT-gmail.com> To: deleuze-guattari-AT-lists.driftline.org Subject: Re: [D-G] deleuze and benjamin on violence DyG often use the term "played out", one example would be conflating neitch.y with deleuze then perhaps I could recommend the (above) endquote of DyG's "what is philosophy, aka "why?"1991, to cure this "symptom." This is where they seriously turn neitsche's "what" back into "why?" and where he adds a question mark onto his 1st apparent affirmation/separation of neitsche and philogosophy. 1st."and" 2nd."?" here is the quote: " B ut what to us seen more important now are the problems of "interference" between the planes that join up in the brain. A 1st type of interference appears when a philosopher attempts to create the concept of a [...] function. [...T]he rule is that the interfering discipline must proceed with its own methods. [...] Thus, there is "extrinsic" interference, because each discipline remains on its own plane and utilizes its own elements. But there is a 2nd "intrinsic" type of interference when concepts and "conceptual personae" seen to leave the plane of immanence that would correspond to them, so as to say in any of the functions and partial obserbers, [...] on another plane. These sliding are so subtle, like those of Zarathustra in Neitsche's philosophy. [...] that we find ourselves on comlex planes that are difficult to qualify. [...] The plane of philosophy is "pre-philosophic" insofar as we consider it in itself independently of the camps that come to occupy it, but "non-philosophy" is found where the plane confronts chaos. Philosophy needs a non-philosophy that comprehends it. They do not need the "No" as beginning, or as the end. [...] but at every moment of their becoming. [...] It is here that concepts [...] become undecidable, [...]as if they shared the same shadow that constantly accompanies [it]. " (note: all "quotes" were added to indicate "italicized" text. the parts that were omitted[...] indicate those several other strands/ that were simultaneious being knotted uptogeghter on the single-suicidal last page, but the whole book is recommended still.) ----------------- it might be tempting to mistake the above "quotations" for an attempt at systematizing two philosophies simultaneously, but Deleuxe and Neitsche are really/always two seperate "dice rolls." so to speak. Readers got to question why Neitsche's-thought is being conflated with Deleuze here. and why to suppose such a conflation is "conventional." (who says that? what ethos are we evoking now?, please specify otherwise the rhetoric will just float away....) so "who" (re: wooden-iron) This is not an "ironic" question, if it was, then getting an anwer would be much sexier.......and we do like that, don't we, The "we" like haraway's andriod lesbian's wee-wee, it likes things to be sexy all the time....... sexy-wind into nite. do you hear music? so "why?" (also "who", but we allowed that abortion to end as a latenight comedy.) Just like certain detentional females who pretend that power exists in "witholding the father's identity", so do we have to w-a-i-t for the answer. This way "it" can be born, eternal-becoming (ah yes!), but "it" is born at least, retarded, r-e-t-a-r-d-e-d, as in "the retarded trans-atlantic crisis." which is certainly WHAT we have given birth to today as we w-a-i-...t ...for... what?. (am I waiting too quickly again?) But nobody was asking "what" except Neitsche (I will feign pathos here) .... so perhaps he just needed to know "What protest to join?" and there are so many today: Anti-Immegration laws.... Anti-labour laws..... Anti-cable access laws.... Anti-war laws..... Anti-houseing laws.... laws... etc... <--- all intentional questions for our sphinx when we ask questions about "pure-violence"..... if we loose our human head we remain only headless beasts capable of all kinds of inhuman violence.(do we need a reminder?) vs. all the detentional questions, are really just a pile of bologna intended for the "einherjar" or intellectual class/thralls for putting them into a retarded aporia, spiralling endgame of "eternal recurrance". (There actually is a complex reason for all this - read Diderot's fatalist to find out.) ....welcome to the clean plate club... come again... :-p _______________________________________________ List address: deleuze-guattari-AT-driftline.org Info: http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org Archives: www.driftline.org
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005