File deleuze-guattari/deleuze-guattari.0607, message 44


From: "hwenk" <hwenk-AT-web.de>
To: <deleuze-guattari-AT-lists.driftline.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 20:37:27 +0200
Subject: Re: [D-G] Deleuze


Hello Adline,

"Dear Deleuze"

I am much to much self reflected to
know who I am - Dr. Harald Wenk,
and who I am not.
To express me more clearly,
I, as most other people I know in reality,
would not want to be another -
whoever it maybe.

To be more clearly it is in my eyes not polite to do
- "Dear Deleuze" -
so, as if it were not the case.

You know much to less about me to do so on
any ground which metaphorical is
only as solid as water.
As I wrote about relations whatever: as clear and honest,
prima facie driven by will of understanding and dialogic, as possible.

So far that.

The second is that you are not answering to what
I wrote not so long ago in replying your email, also
considering what you wrote - not only formally.
That is in my eyes dialogic from my side  .
I don't overrun your arguments, I reply.

My experience and knowledge of
bevyness is not to see it as causal for
such indicated breaks of dialog.


greetings Harald





-----Original Message-----
From: deleuze-guattari-bounces-AT-lists.driftline.org
[mailto:deleuze-guattari-bounces-AT-lists.driftline.org]On Behalf Of adline
vanlindenbergh
Sent: Donnerstag, 27. Juli 2006 19:42
To: adline vanlindenbergh;
deleuze-guattari-driftline.org-AT-lists.driftline.org
Subject: Re: [D-G] Deleuze


--------                          ----------------
-Dear Deleuze
_______                           ----------------

if you watch well:
on certain newspaper the newspaper goes there is a talkback.
people seem to answer to threads, which are Deleuze's
idea of events as mediatic, as opposed of "his events".
    which are not anymore essences.
 the interactive crowd has a strong tendency to be true to the mediatic
 event, and to forget the bevyness in me

i don't remember if Deleuze idea was to remain "digne" true to the
event, and if it's ie.apt to feed-back it.
but that's not the question to me.

the question is: how can I explain the immediate humane consensus in me
which greets adventure of events of mediatic nature if not
by going beyound by sting push the transparent film protecting
as if in a double bubble as you swarm the event in a mediatic
environment.
do you practices this kind of sport in your territory?. i don't explain
what can you/we/I share with an old schizo like me on the tissue
surrounding the
habits I have learned from inhabitants of the mediatic environment. with
what tools can we and do we treat the events?
here? so as to polish better, so it looks smooth. i say here.


deep regards to the listeners

Adline.
--
  adline vanlindenbergh
  bisouxnoursfast-AT-fastmail.fm

--
http://www.fastmail.fm - The way an email service should be

_______________________________________________
List address: deleuze-guattari-AT-driftline.org
Info: http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
Archives: www.driftline.org

_______________________________________________
List address: deleuze-guattari-AT-driftline.org
Info: http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org
Archives: www.driftline.org

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005