From: "hwenk" <hwenk-AT-web.de> To: <deleuze-guattari-AT-lists.driftline.org> Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 01:14:27 +0200 Subject: Re: [D-G] its Hello Dr. cb, When I said from stone age, I meant about 100 000 years b.c or even bevor that, from the time where man were hunters and and collectors, eaters of found fuits. This is time enough to let it go, even by Darwian devices, into the genes concerning the brain in form of some instinct, which can be overrun by neocortex structures, but this cost efforts and learning. This corresponds a little to the partition of the brain, some parts are common to all mamalians, so some are more primitive older, more instinc like. The neurological brain machines going by steps are of course pulsed by brain cycles, so going by steps, the release of neurotransmitters is also in a sequence way, but from simulatious synapses. So, a little, I am pointimng at the "homo natura", which is invoked, the brain as a biolgical basis and being, which has cultutral possibilties of forming and being formed, with yoga also at relativly deep biological levels. The homo natura is the material basis of a world culture - and humanism in old fashion way of speaking. In my eyes it was an right attempt of D&G to remind a little at this biological basis of man, which of course had a wide variance, but there is of course biological heritage. This reflects also in the neuroitransmitters, which production is governed by the cell chemistry from the genes and especially the RNA, which is not so much, in its qualitativ, machine structure, to be influences as one likes. That was a little difference concerning the Body without organs as a "social form". My pont of view, amplified by the usage of herbs and yoga in the stone age, was that there is biological production of neurotransmitters, also in stages, which can be started, stabilized and controlled by well known techniques and possibly by some herbs. As your discussion on peyotl shows, the latter point is as affirmated by you. The function of drugs, medical or not, is very much due to the biological aspects of man. So, there are well known techniques concerning the BWO and also some culture, mostly among religious parctices - up to now. As you know, Foucault researches on monastry practices, in his history of sexuality series, but I think concerning BWO production, some other cultures India, and possibly even the Middle esast, also Shamanism, seem to have a much more uncorrupted and target oriented approach concerning BWO production techniques - based on biological human properties. This is an argument for very strong "poststructural" amalgation from different cultures. This has little been, done, the integration of indian philosophy and psychology, also there are some works, is very little. For medicin, psychology and also from philosophy. To be a little harsh, instead of philosphising a lot about Eurocentrism, an effectiuve taking seriously and building in parts of other cultures, especially in psychology and philosphoy, would have been much more effective. I am strongly convinced, that Aristoteles thinking about the soul is very influenced by other cultures, especially from India - as Alexander the great has been there for example. Also there had been some Indian "Fakirs" in Athen, who let burn themselves without any fear, very impressive at that time, - maybe this influencend the argument in favour of the immortality of the soul by fearlessness of Socrates in the "Phaidon". The last famous attempts to integrate INdian philosphy were from Schopenhauer and Deussen. Nowadays there are much more and better possibilities, due to the increase of knowledge. And western people would benefit a lot. Eastern also, making the insistance on the plausible and tested by a lot of experience parts of their culture compatible with western thinking, therby avoiding the strong cultural splits. The indian economist SEN seess the strong sticking to the religious culture as a very big obstacle for the developpment of the India. I think, it is a very healthy and good motive of "Poststructuralism" to break these cultural "systems" into compatible, very useful and creative pieces. But, in "theoretical" practice, there has not happened much - in my eyes. But, there is a lot of freedom concerning rhythums and contents of human thinking and feeling, leaving more and more the bonds of biological heritage, there we agree. greetings and good night Harld Wenk -----Original Message----- From: deleuze-guattari-bounces-AT-lists.driftline.org [mailto:deleuze-guattari-bounces-AT-lists.driftline.org]On Behalf Of .+oot8am wakeup Sent: Freitag, 29. Juni 2007 23:03 To: deleuze-guattari-AT-lists.driftline.org Subject: Re: [D-G] its the 1..2...3.. or even 4.. 5.... etc, in this case I'm not describing territorialized time(chronos) They are yet not part of a seq but just sets of neuro-machinery. they are the elements of a whole machine which is comprised of parts that can re-combine like (3!) 3x2x1=6, where 6 is all the virtual oedipal possibilities. (nothing in the head is mechanistic really so these are only systemic suggestions still before moving forward into chonological territory) I am aware of a few "narrative" interpretations of "Dont Eat theFruit" but they are all limited by signage, choosing a meaningful allegory. All of that is "higher-up" psychology and not biological. Given the time and place of this narrative (9000bc?), you are probably correct, and I can see perhaps the message reflects that transition towards totalitarian agriculture and the worries of people who oppose that transition away from their stable permaculture. (still an issue today as we face ecological meltdown) But as a pure narrative the symbolism is not necessarily part of its basic function. There is a more fundamental impression, that of patterns/pulses discussed by pinhas and deleuze, which seizes our biology to create territory with which those symbols can later associate. Its not just for music, but in any "forms" (particularly I'm thinking about those described in aristotle's poetics and in the commedia) where the rhythm of these narrative patterns seizes our attention. So your concern about the brain "already functioning" is totally valid and since that is the more complicated scheme, I wanted to deal with a "blank" example before attempting to describe one that involves a chronos, ei before & after. But its the same thing really. Say with our scheme of 3 (dont, eat, thefruit), you see any pattern of elements will combine with an "already functioning" neurology, its just to trace those combinations one would have to determine the internal pulse which interpret the incoming peel. So Dante can set up an elaborate narrative form that "readies" the italian reader for his christian message that he can deliver faithfully encapsulated inside the "already" formed neurology, like a primer coat before actual color paint is applied. This is like those tv adverts that chime in at opportune moments of a Jamesbond flick. cb _______________________________________________ List address: deleuze-guattari-AT-driftline.org Info: http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org Archives: www.driftline.org _______________________________________________ List address: deleuze-guattari-AT-driftline.org Info: http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/deleuze-guattari-driftline.org Archives: www.driftline.org
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005