From: "Dunja Seselja" <seselja-AT-EUnet.yu>
To: <feyerabend-driftline.org-AT-lists.driftline.org>
Subject: Re: [PKF] hi.
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 21:15:32 +0100


I think that Feyerabend's main goal isn't justification of astrology but
showing that science hasn't reached any further than astrology (that's why
he is "justifying" astrology in scientific terms).
Cheers!
     Dunja

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Iolo Savill" <ppyxis-AT-nottingham.ac.uk>
To: <feyerabend-AT-lists.driftline.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 2:46 PM
Subject: [PKF] hi.


> hi.
> i first heard of feyerabend on a philosophy of science module, where the
lecturer presented him as a bit of a crank. however the more i thought about
certain issues such as justification the more i realised that my views
converged with his.
> why does feyerabend attempt to justify astrology in scientific terms in
the three dialogues - surely this misses the point ?
>
> Iolo Savill
>
>
> This message has been scanned but we cannot guarantee that it and any
> attachments are free from viruses or other damaging content: you are
> advised to perform your own checks.  Email communications with the
> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>
> _______________________________________________
> List address: feyerabend-AT-driftline.org
> Admin interface:
http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/feyerabend-driftline.org

_______________________________________________
List address: feyerabend-AT-driftline.org
Admin interface: http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/feyerabend-driftline.org