Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 11:53:10 -0800 To: puptcrit-AT-lists.driftline.org From: Bruce Chesse <bchesse-AT-imagina.com> Subject: Re: [Puptcrit] The Two Types of Puppeteers My how this topic has expanded and flown in every which direction including Harry Partch no less. I saw a performance on his instruments by a colleague of his years ago at UC Santa Cruz with Lou Harrison, the Carter Family and others. It was quite remarkable. Lou was a renowned composer who in 1928 used to visit my father's marionette theaters and went on to compose puppet operas and as we all know was influenced in his music by all phases of Javanese and Balinese art and music. To be a good puppeteer you must be all things, a visual and a performing artist and that is what's important. As for actors or puppeteers their are both bad and good ones depending on their level of experience. However, we are forgetting that the audience too is a much a part of a performance as you the puppeteer. It involves a suspension of belief and your performance must be such that you carry your audience with you. I am reminded of a marionette performance I saw in Oakland, CA in the 60' of The Figuren Triangle. This was a troupe from one of the Benelux countries. They did a dark marionette program of stories influenced in style and decor by the stories of Hyronimous Bosh and the art of the Brougels. I was sitting next to my father and Harry Burnett of Turnabout Theater Fame in LA (he and my father were contemporaries, both pioneers in puppet production). This was and still is one of the greatest marionette shows I have ever seen. My father was blown away and for him it fulfilled his notion of what puppetry should be all about whereas Harry couldn't contain himself. He was so disturbed and uncomfortable that he got up and left the room after the show condemning it in every way. He declared to all that this was not puppetry and it was an insult to the craft. What am I trying to say? Art is in the eye of the beholder. Both my father and Harry were considered great puppeteers, meaning men who created their shows from the ground up, conceiving building and performing but they were as different as night and day. The technology of the day was very simplistic. Harry's puppets were not great art but the total shows they produced were clever and unique and had content and entertained. My father was a minimalist when it came to manipulation. The artful figure combined with the live dialogue, settings and carefully chosen music created an illusion that transported you into an Elizabethan or 17th century French world of language. He was told by colleagues in his time that doing Shakespeare and Molliére with puppets should be left to actors as it was not a vehicle for puppetry. The puppeteers were his sisters and artists living in an around North Beach in San Francisco. It was also a place where you could pool your resources and feed each other. It was the greatest artistic social experiment that ever took place in this country. During the WPA period you were not supposed to hire professionals. Your project trained people and gave them work. If you look up many of the actors who got their start in the WPA many were puppeteers first and became well know actors afterwards. Finally each of these puppeteers brought to the craft something of excellence unique and separate in their own way. What made them equals was their passion for what they were trying to do. If you want to carry on this conversation distinguish between the creator and the puppeteer or actor who is carrying out the ideas of the creator. Basil Twist (from San Francisco originally) is a creator who has the vision. The people who carry out his ideas are trained and at times it is the puppet itself that does the training. It can only move the way it is constructed to move. The skill is to be found in listening to its dictates. The puppet teaches me what it wants me to do. A puppeteer, of note, once took a puppet of mine and had it do and speak in ways that it was not meant to do. It was one of the most horrifying moment for me. I never let him touch a puppet of mine again. Bruce Chessé > >Dancers often make great puppeteers. >>- Andrew > >I totally agree. I've met quite a few. The most impressive I've seen at >puppet movements almost all had dancing backgrounds. They sure know their >bodies and how to transfer energies. > >I wonder if Basil Twist has a dancing background as well? >When I saw him live last spring with his Stickman, I was hynotised by the >magic his puppet made! In his case, there was no competition for the >public's attention. Both puppet and puppeteers were of the same act, a >seamless union such as I've never seen before or since. More than dance >partners, they almost seemd like a single being inhabiting two bodies at >once, if that makes sense. >I'll always remember the scene near the end where Stickman takes flight >slowly, the leg of the puppeteer becoming the means to elevation. > > > >Mathieu René Créaturiste >Marionnettes, Masques, Etcetera... >Puppets, Masks, Etcetera... >SITE officiel: www.magma.ca/~uubald/ >www.creaturiste.blogspot.com >www.maskmaking.blogspot.com >creaturiste-AT-magma.ca >(514) 274-8027 > >_______________________________________________ >List address: puptcrit-AT-lists.driftline.org >Admin interface: >http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/puptcrit-driftline.org >Archives: http://www.driftline.org _______________________________________________ List address: puptcrit-AT-lists.driftline.org Admin interface: http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/puptcrit-driftline.org Archives: http://www.driftline.org
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005