From: "Preston Foerder" <preston-AT-pfpuppetry.com>
To: <puptcrit-AT-lists.driftline.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 16:01:16 -0400
Subject: Re: [Puptcrit] Tony Sarg book reprinted


Though it has been pointed out to me that rather than Tony Sarg being a
hero even though he was a puppeteer, it might be saying that he was
forgotten even though he was a puppeteer.  Either way it's an imprecise
bad sentence.

Preston

-----Original Message-----
From: puptcrit-bounces-AT-lists.driftline.org
[mailto:puptcrit-bounces-AT-lists.driftline.org] On Behalf Of Kathleen
David
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 3:50 PM
To: puptcrit-AT-lists.driftline.org
Subject: Re: [Puptcrit] Tony Sarg book reprinted

Considering that they DO cover puppetry a little more than the other  
rag in town (Yeah, I know that the NYT is better about reviewing  
puppetry) I don't think they have anything against it as much as they  
are part of the general mind-hive that says puppets are for children.  
(That hive-mind is a rant unto itself for me)

Kathleen

On Apr 9, 2007, at 3:33 PM, Stephen Kaplin wrote:

> What does the Daily News have against puppeteers?  I want to know.
> Anyone in pupt-world have a theory?
>
> SK
_______________________________________________
List address: puptcrit-AT-lists.driftline.org
Admin interface:
http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/puptcrit-driftline.org
Archives: http://www.driftline.org


_______________________________________________
List address: puptcrit-AT-lists.driftline.org
Admin interface: http://lists.driftline.org/listinfo.cgi/puptcrit-driftline.org
Archives: http://www.driftline.org