Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:50:23 -0400 From: "Steve Abrams" <sapuppets-AT-gmail.com> To: puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org Subject: Re: [Puptcrit] Table Top Rod Puppet History A little off subject- but since you asked First use is always tricky to determine. There is a rod puppet theatre called Hanneschen established in 1802 in Cologne Germany. Supposedly Richard Teschner first encountered Javanese rod puppets while on his honeymoon in Amsterdam. (around 1911) Back in Vienna Teschner made his own versions of wayang golek. It is my impression that Teschner influenced Nina Efimova. I believe her book appeared in Russian in 1925 right around the time she first starting using rod puppets She says of her rod puppets with hidden rods "Puppets perform almost as well on a table as on a stage.' P114 in Luman Coad's reprint of Adventures of a Russian Puppet Theatre McPharlin had Efimova's book translated and published in 1935. McPharlin himself did a little rod puppetry but it was Marjorie Batchelder who really gave rod puppets serious consideration. She and her students built two productions using a hand and rod puppets =96 Columbine's Birthday and St. George and the Dragon" =96 presented at the 1936 Puppetry Conference. Her best-known rod puppet production was Maeterlinck's "The Death of Tintagiles." In the 30s and 40s there was a distinction made between "rod puppets" and "hand-and-rod" puppets. You don't hear that distinction used much today. There are some that reserve the term rod puppet for some thing like a golek that has a rod in the head as well as the two arm rods I had always considered the Muppets (especially Kermit) to be rod puppets because (well duh) his arms are worked by rods. I was surprised to learn that some tend to think of them not as rod puppets but as hand puppets with a moving mouth that happen to have rods controlling the arms Slight change of subject- The short rod table top technique gives a lot of control and does sort of force the operator to be visible- except of course in TV production What was first called chromakey and then called bluescreen and now called greenscreen makes it easy to erase the puppeteer from what is really a table top show. I think this aspect of table top has much more to do with film technology than with roots in Japan. There is a glamor and sophistication to claiming a Japanese pedigree for table top, and I don't think it is wrong to make that claim but I like to keep it real. Using a table top is just a very obvious choice as a way to work puppets and I still think the origin is kids or adults playing with dollies on a table top- see Baird p 66 double planchette figures from the 12th century (no rods, but definitely table top) Steve On 9/27/07, Liz Evans <liz-AT-etherboy.com> wrote: > Steve, > > I should have been more specific. The style that was relayed to me > as deriving from ningyo joruri, or more specifically from > Otome-Bunraku utilizing udegane to support the puppet body, was Full > body three dimensional characters (with move able Head, arms, legs etc) > used to tell a story. Yes, one to three performers (in view) on a puppet > with short rods. > > Where as a child manipulating a stuffed animal on a table could be > called table top puppetry, the same could be said of a Japanese > children holding a stuffed animal off a table and manipulating it, > "Bunraku puppetry". I am speaking of professional trained performance. > > I will look into the Fetig book, but I was, as you mentioned, under the > impression that the long rod puppets came from a Java background. > More input would be great. Thanks for the tip, I will investigate > that avenue. > > Best, > Liz > K. Elizabeth Evans, President & Artistic Director > Renaissance Artist Puppet Company > http://www.RenArtPuppetCo.com > 610-630-4259 > Company performing -AT- > The Montgomery County Cultural Center > 208 DeKalb Street, Norristown, PA > > Renaissance Artist Puppet Company's > mission is to promote excellence in puppetry as a > Theatrical art form and as an Educational tool by incorporating > historical and cultural diversity along with quality performance > techniques to tell our stories. > _______________________________________________ > List address: puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org > Admin interface: http://lists.puptcrit.org/mailman/listinfo/puptcrit > Archives: http://www.driftline.org > _______________________________________________ List address: puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org Admin interface: http://lists.puptcrit.org/mailman/listinfo/puptcrit Archives: http://www.driftline.org
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005