From: "Naomi Guss" <na-AT-puppetsinmelbourne.com.au> To: <puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 11:28:31 +1100 Subject: Re: [Puptcrit] "Avatar" is a puppet show! I personally would think that motion capture actors are more akin to dancers than anything else. They would have to have an exceptional understanding of range of motion, and the ability to precisely convey that motion so that the cameras can clearly pick it up (as well as providing the animators with some sort of emotional basis for facial expressions, gestures, etc.). ------- Naomi Guss www.puppetsinmelbourne.com.au Puppets in Melbourne -----Original Message----- From: Hobey Ford [mailto:hobeyone-AT-gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 7 January 2010 6:17 AM To: puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org Subject: Re: [Puptcrit] "Avatar" is a puppet show! I think it is fair to say that "Avatar" is related to puppetry, but I wouldn't go as far as calling it puppetry or a puppet show (though it isn't an important distinction and really is just semantics). The motion capture technology used here and with Golem in Lord of the rings is based on an actors performance which is electronically transferred to a computer graphic. An actor in costume and make-up isn't a puppet and they are essentially doing the same as the actors in motion capture. I propose that they are actors portraying a role with electronic make-up. They don't understand or have any skill understanding or meaningful involvement with the art and craft of puppetry. They are very good actors (maybe) who are having a special effect laid upon them digitally. I think this an interesting topic but I wouldn't argue the point of it being puppetry or not, as puppetry has always evolved. The "old school" devotees have always questioned "Is this puppetry?" And clearly the definition of puppetry needs room to grow, but in this instance my vote is that if it is puppetry, then that is a pretty big stretch. I would say Motion capture is more related to mime or mask theater, possibly body costume digital puppetry but not puppetry. For me that would require the actor to be in full control of the digital figure without the aid of cosmetic animators and the like. To use the old analogy of monkey as artist, a monkey could be dressed in a motion capture suit and transformed digitally into a different creature, but I would never call the monkey a puppeteer: if so I am a monkey's uncle. On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Bell, John <john.bell-AT-uconn.edu> wrote: > I disagree with the idea that "Avatar" is not puppetry: "Avatar" is puppetry, motion capture is puppetry, and we should be excited about that fact. =A0Motion capture is the movement of the human body in order to control the movement of an image, an object in performance, and is therefore puppetry. > > See for example Andy Serkis's book about his work manipulating the motion capture figure of Gollum in "Lord of the Rings", in which the "p" word was routinely used by the performers and tech crew to describe what they were doing. > > It's important to consider this because otherwise the history of techniques like motion capture is thought to begin about two decades ago, when in fact the philosophy and aesthetics of motion capture go back centuries in the global history of puppet theater. > > The frequent captions of "Avatar" press photos which identify the motion capture images in the film as the performers themselves are entirely misleading and are a misunderstanding of the form; as if a caption for a photo of Kermit said "Jim Henson as Kermit." > > "Avatar" is a puppet show! =A0Not a good puppet show dramaturgically, because its depiction of a white guy warrior saving the poor blue people is hopelessly irrelevant in our world, and because its espousal of extreme violence as the solution to serious problems is not such a good augury; but a puppet show nonetheless! > > Dr. John T. Bell > Director > Ballard Institute and Museum of Puppetry > University of Connecticut > 6 Bourn Place Unit 5212 > Storrs, Connecticut=A0 06269-5212 > office: 860 486 0806 > cell: 617 599 3250 > www.bimp.uconn.edu > > To make a contribution to the Ballard Institute and Museum of Puppetry, please go to > https://secure.ga4.org/01/uconn_foundation_giving, and select "Ballard Puppetry Museum" from the "Purpose" list. =A0Thanks for your support! > > -----Original Message----- > From: puptcrit-bounces-AT-puptcrit.org [mailto:puptcrit-bounces-AT-puptcrit.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Kaplin > Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 10:21 AM > To: puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org > Subject: Re: [Puptcrit] Avatar go see it > > I think it is extraordinary the way that the new motion capture > technologies have blurred the boundary between puppet and human > performer. The puppet becomes more like a skin to the performer than a > separate performing object. However, that skin is not simply a costume > one slips on and off-- it is a =A0digital construct created at great > expense of money and labour. > > But what is interesting is that the intense application of technology, > (which for most forms of puppetry functions to extend the gap between > the operator and the performing figure) bring the performer and > performing object back together in tight embrace. > > Don't know if that is enough to make me drop $15 to see the 3-d movie. > > Stephen > > > On Jan 6, 2010, at 12:10 AM, Puppet People wrote: > >> Hi critters; >> =A0 =A0Though not techniquely puppets , I would recommend to all in the >> puppetry world to go and see the movie Avatar. I just saw it and was >> blown >> away by the computer graphics and 3-D effect. Also I should add the >> story is >> good too. >> =A0 =A0I know, I know, it's not puppetry but I think that animation is a >> form >> of puppetry and the CG stuff that can be done today is amazing. What >> are >> your thoughts? >> >> Mark >> The Puppet People >> >> _______________________________________________ >> List address: puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org >> Admin interface: http://lists.puptcrit.org/mailman/listinfo/puptcrit >> Archives: http://www.driftline.org > > _______________________________________________ > List address: puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org > Admin interface: http://lists.puptcrit.org/mailman/listinfo/puptcrit > Archives: http://www.driftline.org > _______________________________________________ > List address: puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org > Admin interface: http://lists.puptcrit.org/mailman/listinfo/puptcrit > Archives: http://www.driftline.org > _______________________________________________ List address: puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org Admin interface: http://lists.puptcrit.org/mailman/listinfo/puptcrit Archives: http://www.driftline.org
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005