From: "Mark S. Segal" <segalpuppets-AT-comcast.net> To: <puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org> Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 15:20:04 -0500 Subject: Re: [Puptcrit] Resident Puppet Theatres I always liked (and use) the words Puppet Theatre..... Theatre is the operative word there I think and puppetry is a description. Mark S. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hobey Ford" <hobeyone-AT-gmail.com> To: <puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org> Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2010 7:55 AM Subject: Re: [Puptcrit] Resident Puppet Theatres > After the last couple of rounds of US elections I have thought alot about > words and their meanings and reality as described by the various > paricipants. In the process I began to become quite sensitive to > advertizing. I began an experiment to look at all ads and promotion with > the idea that they are mistruths or out and out lies. Once I made the > shift > it seemed that every last ad was a lie in some significant way. We all > see > reality differently and yet at the core of it "a rose is a rose". > > Puppetry has at its heart this very issue. We pursuade the audience to > believe in a proxy of reality. We were the shaman in the cave convincing > our fellows that some fur and bones could come alive. There is power in > this act. Perhaps the reason puppetry holds on to this baggage of being > slightly mistrusted is that at its core it is a deception. Now a host of > other arts and media have gotten into the act. The supreme use of the > deception is politics where there actually is power and even in that arena > the word "puppet" has come along for the ride. I don't think we will > ever > shake it at some level. The word carries so much baggage. "Marionette" > doesn't seem to have the problem. "Shadow puppet" comes right out and > makes > it even more sinister. Of course rational human beings recognize that > these > are words. The public seems eager to see a puppet show, but I imagine > they > must first decide "OK, which kind of puppetry is this going to be, > because > it can be so many things to different people. So we have to use some > language to make it clear what we do. Are we for adults? are we for the > teenie tinies,, are we a bible show at church are we presenting purely > entertainment or selling or teaching a message. We all groan when we read > what the press has written to describe what we do as they earnestly try to > help us "sell " our event. In school we were taught to write with > clarity. Keep it simple and straight forward. Adverbs and adjectives are > essentially advertisments and thus "spinners of truth." (puppetry by the > way is the verb) This why it bothers me to spread the umbrella of the > word > too far. It is already doing a lot of work and it is hard enough now to > sort it all out as it stands. If we want to enlighten the world about > puppetry of course the proof will be in the pudding, but to lure the > audience to the table we must use words. We all have to maneuver around > the > the word "puppet" because it has so many connotations. "She who will not > be > named" ;o) avoids the word preferring "theater artist". Jim Henson opted > for a new word, "muppet". I like the word puppet. I am not ready to > abandon > the word or give it away to other artforms, they have there own words to > describe what they do. I know that it is misunderstood so I use it as > often > as possible to associate it with what I do because I believe I will be an > advocate if people like what they see. They will say "I saw a great > puppet > show today" and we will chip away at the odd connotations of the word > puppet.. > _______________________________________________ > List address: puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org > Admin interface: http://lists.puptcrit.org/mailman/listinfo/puptcrit > Archives: http://www.driftline.org _______________________________________________ List address: puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org Admin interface: http://lists.puptcrit.org/mailman/listinfo/puptcrit Archives: http://www.driftline.org
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005