From: "Bil Bug" <thatpuppetguy-AT-q.com>
To: <puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:03:32 -0600
Subject: Re: [Puptcrit] self publishing


I use InDesign, for the reasons listed in other emails, for the newsletter I 
work with. Paul Eide, editor of the "Puppetry Journal" (PofA magazine) also 
swears by InDesign (and maybe sometimes at it, too, but then don't we all 
some days . . . :-) ?).
Wayne Krefting

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Simon Palmer" <simon-AT-illustrated-history.net>
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 7:45 PM
To: <puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org>
Subject: Re: [Puptcrit] self publishing

> InDesign is cheaper and easier to use, I never really liked Quark but
> it came with the job, thankfully I haven't used Quark for 4 or 5
> years now.
>
> Simon Palmer
> Illustrated History
> +44 (0) 161 611 0739
> +44 (0) 7944 804414
> www.illustrated-history.net
> www.doodleblog.co.uk
>
>
>
>
> On 25 Feb 2010, at 01:33, Hobey Ford wrote:
>
>> InDesign or Quark
>>
>>
>> Which of these softwares would you recommend for ease of use and
>> price?
>> _______________________________________________
>> List address: puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org
>> Admin interface: http://lists.puptcrit.org/mailman/listinfo/puptcrit
>> Archives: http://www.driftline.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> List address: puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org
> Admin interface: http://lists.puptcrit.org/mailman/listinfo/puptcrit
> Archives: http://www.driftline.org
> 
_______________________________________________
List address: puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org
Admin interface: http://lists.puptcrit.org/mailman/listinfo/puptcrit
Archives: http://www.driftline.org