Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 12:31:37 -0500
From: Hobey Ford <hobeyone-AT-gmail.com>
To: puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org
Subject: Re: [Puptcrit] puptcrit Digest, Vol 64, Issue 26 snob


Sorry, I missed the message below, Nancy.   I see your point.

On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 11:46 AM, <NANCYSTAUB-AT-aol.com> wrote:

> snob
>
> In a message dated 2/26/2010 11:00:13 A.M. Central Standard Time,
> puptcrit-request-AT-puptcrit.org writes:
>
> But I  have to disagree
> with the architect who to me comes across as a snob, who  doesn't think
> "the
> public" knows anything and could possibly have a  valuable opinion.  We are
> talking about art, not science.  It is  a subjective topic where everyone
> does have a valid opinion because in the  end thats all anyone's opinion
> is...an opinion.
> I think the architect was not a snob,  His comment simply  suggests that
> opinions vary in credibility. All opinions are  subjective as they are
> based
> on many factors: experience, knowledge, language,  culture, personality,
> etc.
> This is true in science as well as art. Many  scientific opinions have
> proven more credible than  others.
> _______________________________________________
> List address: puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org
> Admin interface: http://lists.puptcrit.org/mailman/listinfo/puptcrit
> Archives: http://www.driftline.org
>
_______________________________________________
List address: puptcrit-AT-puptcrit.org
Admin interface: http://lists.puptcrit.org/mailman/listinfo/puptcrit
Archives: http://www.driftline.org