File spoon-archives/anarchy-list.archive/anarchy-list_1998/anarchy-list.9810, message 42


Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 19:39:12 -0500 (EST)
From: ricinger-AT-inch.com (Richard Singer)
Subject: Re: To The Freaks . . .


At 06:48 PM 10/30/98 EST, DIYplaid-AT-aol.com wrote:

>In a message dated 10/30/98 5:46:25 PM Central Standard Time,
>the_agent_zero-AT-hotmail.com writes:
>
><< No you haven't cunt. >>
>aight, i'm not responding to anything else he said....b/c well this ONE
>line....GRR....proves to me what a complete moron he is....
>

        Agent Zero might very well be a moron, but there's nothing wrong
with using the curse word "cunt."  In fact, the word can be particularly
amusing when used in the British way, i.e., as a curse against a man.  I
believe that Agent Zero has used it against both genders, so let us at least
acknowledge that.  Although, when it comes right down to it, it shouldn't
matter anyway...

        I had a discussion about a month ago with a woman who was acting all
self-righteously outraged because some guy had called her a cunt...  She
insisted that this was extremely sexist and that any man who uses this term
against a woman should be made to suffer for it.  I reminded her that she
often went around calling men pricks, and she said that was different.
Personally, I won't stand for this double standard.  If we're going to talk
about pricks, then we are entitled to talk about cunts.



Richard S.



P.S.  BTW, don't you dare call me "Dick"!












   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005