File spoon-archives/anarchy-list.archive/anarchy-list_1998/anarchy-list.9810, message 80


From: DIYplaid-AT-aol.com
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1998 15:28:45 EST
Subject: Re: To The Freaks . . .


In a message dated 10/30/98 6:56:57 PM Central Standard Time,
ricinger-AT-inch.com writes:

<< >In a message dated 10/30/98 5:46:25 PM Central Standard Time,
 >the_agent_zero-AT-hotmail.com writes:
 >
 ><< No you haven't cunt. >>
 >aight, i'm not responding to anything else he said....b/c well this ONE
 >line....GRR....proves to me what a complete moron he is....
 >
 
         Agent Zero might very well be a moron, but there's nothing wrong
 with using the curse word "cunt."  In fact, the word can be particularly
 amusing when used in the British way, i.e., as a curse against a man.  I
 believe that Agent Zero has used it against both genders, so let us at least
 acknowledge that.  Although, when it comes right down to it, it shouldn't
 matter anyway...
 
         I had a discussion about a month ago with a woman who was acting all
 self-righteously outraged because some guy had called her a cunt...  She
 insisted that this was extremely sexist and that any man who uses this term
 against a woman should be made to suffer for it.  I reminded her that she
 often went around calling men pricks, and she said that was different.
 Personally, I won't stand for this double standard.  If we're going to talk
 about pricks, then we are entitled to talk about cunts.
  >>
aww...i didnt mean to make my responce sound like that.....i'm not offended
cos cunt was directed at a girl. i think its stupid to go around name
calling....ya know? tre third grade

maggi

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005