Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 07:49:40 -0500 (EST)
From: Tom Trouble <twbounds-AT-pop.erols.com>
Subject: Re: Punks


At 12:26 AM 2/28/99 -0500, Jamal wrote:
>I suspect it is reverse-psychology.  This agent person may be trying to
>get us to defend punks so it looks like we are defending him, or
>"lifestyle" anarchism, or something. I dunno.  Personaly, I like punks
>quite a bit, and have found them to be the social group most aware of
>anarchism.  This doesnt mean that Agent Zero himself isnt a creep, though.
>
>Chuck, if this guy is Tad, why are you sort-of defending him?  I've seen
>you denounce other people for much less than what he's done.  Like people
>who criticize lifestyle anarchism, for instance.  Seems kinda unfair.

Chuck defending Tad?  Did I miss something?  I don't think Chuck will ever
invite Tad or Bob Black to his place.  Not a good idea.  Inviting Bookchin
over could be fun.  There's some entertainment value in grumpy old men.  

And isn't punk just a "lifestyle"?  -  Tom