Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 14:09:59 -0800
From: "Senex R. Rupicapra" <olgoat-AT-kdsi.net>
Subject: Re: baby food


Brian J. Callahan wrote:
> 
> Jonathan writes:
> >One wouldn't necessarily need to recreate the hunter-gatherer mode of
> >living: there's nothing that says all tribes must be hunter gatherers.
> >However, if there were some way to "get rid of" 9/10 of the population of
> >this planet, it would be better for all involved.  The thing is, no one
> >seems to have a good way to do it...
> 
> But if the tribe was not hunter-gatherer, they wouldn't be living
> "naturally", they'd be living in some kind of at least agricultural societry,
> with all the problems that you spelled out.
> 
> As for this good riddance for the 9/10ths, I sure hope you plan on letting
> your fellow -AT--lister be part of that special 1/10th.   Actually the mass
> murder of 4 billion people and subsequent corpse disposal would be a
> logistical nightmare.  Just look at the problems the Natzis, fairly efficient
> killers, had getting rid of just 10 million or so.  And if a substantial
> group of that 4 billion resisted or decided to take you with them, even more
> headaches.
> 
> So, given these practical difficulties, perhaps we could work for a better
> world with just about everybody living to see it.

	naw y just turn 9 outta 10 babies born in the next
--say--40 to 50 years into baby food and attrition takes care 
o the rest.  at least it'd get y started down the right track.

	old goat.
	there ain’t no such thing as a free lunch.
	ÐÏ à¡± á