From: "Andy" <as-AT-spelthorne.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 21:39:51 +0000
Subject: re: baby food and ape food




> Andy writes:
> >By the way, did anyone see the item in the news about SIV the 
> >chimpanzee form of HIV and theory that it broke into the humans by 
> >some humans ' eating' them .....
> >
> >......oh yeah?????
> 
> I heard that this morning.  The question I must Clintonesquely pose is, what 
> is their definition of "eating."  Does it include within its scope the slang 
> expression?  It must get lonely in the jungle...
> 
> BTW, is beastality always rape, or can (non-human) animals give consent?  
> Say, hypothetically of course, one were to spread peanut butter, a food with 
> which one's dog is enamored, on a particular body part;  could the subsequent 
> licking be considered consensual?  Certainly both parties are getting 
> something, no?  
> 

I'd say just be careful not to spread crunchy peanut butter, so's 
they don't have to bite.

Wasn't Jimmy Carter the peanut butter president????

Shouldn't  Kenneth Starr get onto this now?

Incidentally, there is a particularly rancid burger chain in West 
London [that even a black pudding aficionado such as myself avoids] 
called Starrburgers. I wonder if this is a euphemism.

Home time for me.
>AS