File spoon-archives/anarchy-list.archive/anarchy-list_1999/anarchy-list.9902, message 249


Date: 08 Feb 1999 00:41:00 +0200
From: I-AFD_2-AT-anarch.free.de (Nico MYOWNA)
Subject: Re: Nietzsche (was Re: baby food)


Hi,

I have wrote:

"....if you know Nietzsche and the ideology of Nazi-ism."

I haven't wrote:

"....if you know Nietzsche, the Nazi, and the Nazi-ism."  or
"....if you know the Nazi Nietzsche and his Nazi-ism."

There is a interrelation between Nietzsches ideas and the interpretation  
of Nietzsche by Nazi trends. This mean "....if you know Nietzsche and the  
(ideology of) Nazi-ism." I speak about a *real* interrelation in our  
history between Nietzsches work and Nazi-ism *and not* about Nietzsche  
himself, his motives or ideas. I have wrote about the historical under-  
standing of Nietzsche by means of his right-wing readers between 1890 and  
1945. His book about the Ubermann (Uebermensch), which should be burned in  
the last will of Nietzsche, was in the interpretation of many right-wing  
readers a back up of the anti-democratic "Survival of the fittest".

On the other hand have there been an anarchist interpretation of Nietzsche  
during the years 1918 and 1933 (with nearly the same arguments of your  
last statement about the "Trans-man" and the flux of his will-to-power).  
Both have indeed nothing to do with Nietzsche....

It's not my responsibility, if you understood a philosopher like Nietz- 
sche as isolated without any effect on history. It's not my damn respon-  
sibility, too, if you doesn't know the philosophical context of Nietzsche
and his ideas. It's not my crap, if you deny every historical interpreta- 
tion on Nietzsches ideas before and after his death....

What the fuck does your comment/protest have to do with my words?  --
Answer : nothing. It's not my responsibility, if you are not able to read  
and to understand. It's your fucking responsibility, if YOU bring in  
McCarty Era tactics here of guilt by associations about my words....

If YOU doesn't understand the meaning of my words, than you should ask  
first. Your first argument wasn't a question -- your first argument was to  
deny the intelligence and insight of all persons who bring Nietzsches  
ideas in interrelation between some trends of Nazi-ism. This is veritable  
a McCarty Era tactic. If you generalice your interpretation on Nietzsche  
and set up this as the absolut truth, than you shouldn't be dismayed that  
other persons cannot deal this "truth" with you. If you are not able to  
discuss, nobody will hold you if you leave....

Nico






## CrossPoint v3.11 ##

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005