From: "Dave Coull" <d.y.coull-AT-dundee.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 10:30:18 GMT Subject: Re: Darwin and God John Holden wrote >I know a very popular christian excuse is that 7 days to god >is 4.6 billion years. It's a stupid and absured excuse, but >most christians... You live in Lubbock, Texas, don't you, John ? The most fundamentalist town in the bible belt of the southern USA ? This may come as a surprise to you, but Lubbock is not typical of most christians. No, it's not a "stupid and absured excuse". It is actually a very cunning one, a very subtle argument which you have simply failed to understand. The argument goes like this. God is eternal. "Eternal" does not mean the same thing as "immortal". "Immortal" merely means that, having been born, a person will live forever. "Forever" is a very long time - but it _is_ a _time_. "Eternal", on the other hand, is something very different. "Eternal" means not affected by time. Outside of time. "Eternal" means that all time - past, present, and future - is "now". As the Book of Revelations puts it, "I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end." Now, what is a day ? A day is a human measure of time, based on the time it takes the earth to turn on its axis. But the time which it takes the earth to turn on its axis has in fact changed through time (there is a gradual slowing down) so that means that the length of a "day" has changed through time. "Day" is a variable. And in any case, many scientists do maintain that time itself had a beginning. And both the Book of Genesis and virtually all scientific opinion agree that there was such a thing as a time when time had come into existence but the earth had not yet been formed. So what was a "day" before the earth came into existence? What was a "day" before this human measurement had any meaning? Are we talking about a "day" in the eyes of God? "Eternal" means that all time is "now". So, from _that_ point of view, there is no difference between twenty four hours and 4.6 billion years. So, Holden, by all means argue with such ideas. But at least try to understand what it is you are up against. Don't call ideas "stupid and absured" just because you haven't understood them. Dave
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005