File spoon-archives/anarchy-list.archive/anarchy-list_1999/anarchy-list.9902, message 406


Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 17:22:15 -0500 (EST)
From: danceswithcarp <dcombs-AT-bloomington.in.us>
Subject: Re: Fwd Re: Re: Zero Work, Work Resistance




On 10 Feb 1999, Nico MYOWNA wrote:

> CAN SOMEONE ANYONE PLEASE TRY NOT TO BE SO GODDAMN IGNORANT??? JESUS
> CHRIST!!!!

Watch the fucking obscenities, bub.
 
> Tell me, are you living in the 1950's? Where do you get your information?
> 1940's Encyclopedia Brittanica? What the fuck?  First of all, the bulk of food
> in a hunting gathering society is provided through gathering ....

This is not universally true, just generally true; there are always
exceptions.  Some of the more northern peoples may actually have taken
more nutrition from flesh than vegetation.  Also some of the
paleo/neo--lithic societies may have tilted towards flesh.  

Even so--not having a handy cite on these basic anomalies that make your
statement not-so-universally true--what is interesting about the general
nutrition bias toward gathering (somewhere between 70%-30% to 60%-40% in
favor of plants is the accepted _norm_) is that in by far the overwhelming
amount of gathering has been by femyles of the specie while the men were
occupied in less beneficial activities.

Why is this interesting?  I dunno. Maybe it explains why american males
tend to gravitate towards watching TV sports while womyn raise children,
do laundry, and have headaches.


carp


   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005