File spoon-archives/anarchy-list.archive/anarchy-list_1999/anarchy-list.9902, message 577


Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 12:13:25 -0800
From: "Senex R. Rupicapra" <olgoat-AT-kdsi.net>
Subject: Re: Thanks, but...


Our Kindly Ol' Unka Bart wrote:
> 
> I'm not talking about merely believing something that
> you simply have no evidence or first hand experience
> that would prove the matter, such as believing that the
> sun will come up tomorrow; so let's not get into that;
> but Holden, or anyone, would you care to help me understand
> how a thinking person can believe that god is one thing
> or another, or that the Bible is the unvarnished word of god?
> 
> This is not an attempt to insult anyone, but a simple
> quest to understand something that is beyond my simple ken.

	yep, i recall the story o the mope that was running 
for gov o Texas against Ma Richards got into the "official
state language" imbroglio.  his contention:  "If the English
language was good enough for our Lord, Jesus Christ, it's--
by God--good enough for the school children of Texas."
	i mean, what else would the revealed word of God be
written in?  3;o)> 
	BTW, i was always taught that the sun dont move in
relation to the planets.  quite the contrary.  o course,
i been wrong afore.

	old (simple) goat.
	although institutional force is more 
	powerful and frightening than random force,  
	it is, also, more predictable.
	ÐÏ à¡± á

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005