Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 09:37:33 -0400 From: lbekich-AT-MNSi.Net (Larry Bekich) Subject: Fwd: (en) EDWARD SAID -- Protecting the Kosovars >> ________________________________________________ >> A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E >> http://www.ainfos.ca/ >> ________________________________________________ >> >>Protecting the Kosovars By Edward Said >> ONCE again, and led by the United States as usual, a war is being >>conducted -this time in Europe - against an unprincipled and racist >>dictator who will almost certainly survive the onslaught even though >>thousands of innocents will pay the actual price. The pretext this time is >>of course the persecution, ethnic cleansing and continued oppression of >>Albanians in the province of Kosovo by the Serbian forces of Slobodan >>Milosevic. >> >> No one at all doubts that horrible things have been done to the >>Albanians under Serbian domination, but the question is whether US/NATO >>policy will alleviate things or whether they will in fact be made worse by >>a bombing campaign whose supposed goal is to make Milosevic give up his >>policies. >> >> Since, as in most cases, the bombing campaign is not all that it >>seems to be, a look behind the headlines is worth the effort, especially >>given the new ferocity and willingness to intervene militarily on the part >>of US foreign policy decision makers (Clinton, Cohen, Albright, Berger). >> >> One needs to remember that since the US is a world, and not merely a >>regional, power one calculation that enters each of its foreign policy >>decisions is how the deployment of its military might will affect the US's >>image in the eyes of other, especially other competitive countries. Henry >>Kissinger made that point a central concern of his Indochinese policy when >>he undertook the secret bombing of Laos: your enemies will learn that >>there are no limits to what you are prepared to do, even to the point of >>appearing totally irrational. Thus the exercise of massive destructiveness >>wholly disproportionate to the goal, say, of stopping an enemy from >>advancing further, is a principal aim of this policy, as it has been of >>Israel's policy in southern Lebanon, where massive raids on civilian >>encampments do absolutely nothing to affect Israel's main enemies, the >>Hizballah guerillas. Punishment is its own goal, bombing as a display of >>NATO authority its own satisfaction, especially when there is little >>chance of retaliation from the enemy. >> >> That is one consideration behind the current bombing of Yugoslavia. >>Another is the misguided and totally hopeless >>goal of humbling, and perhaps even destroying Milosevic's regime. >>This, as has been the case in Iraq, is illusory. >>No nation, no matter how badly attacked from the air is going to >>rally to the attackers. >> >> If anything, Milosevic's regime is now strengthened. All Serbs feel >>that their country is attacked unjustly, and that the cowardly war from >>the air has made them feel persecuted. Besides, not even the Kosovo >>Albanians believe that the air campaign is about independence for Kosovo > >>or about saving Albanian lives: that is a total illusion. >> >> What transpired before the bombing was that the US seems to have >>persuaded the Kosovars that if they went along with the "peace plan" >>Kosovo would get its independence; this was never said, but only implied, >>leading the Kosovars to expect NATO help. But, as usual, the US has never >>stated unequivocally that it is for full self-determination for all the >>peoples of former Yugoslavia. There should have been a straight-out and >>clearly stated willingness to accept self-determination for Kosovo as well >>as a safeguarding of rights for the Serbian minority there. None of this >>was done. And neither were the consequences thought through, i.e., the >>certainty that the Serb forces would respond to NATO bombardment by >>intensifying their attacks against Albanian civilians, more ethnic >>cleansing, more refugees, more trouble for the future. There is now talk >>of 200,000 ground troops (mostly American) to enter the battle and expand >>the war, with the attendant problems of prolonged occupation, guerilla >>warfare, greater devastation, more refugees, and so on. A lot of this >>comes from the delusion that the US is the world's policeman. In the >>meantime, its genocidal policy against Iraq continues, and its sanctions >>policy against other Islamic or Arab countries also continues. >> >> Nothing of what the US or NATO does now has anything really to do >>with protecting the Kosovars or bringing them independence: it is rather a >>display of military might whose long-range effect is disastrous, just as >>is a similar policy in the Middle East. In 1994 when a US intervention >>might have averted genocide in Rwanda, there was no action. The stakes >>were not high enough, and black people not worth the effort. >> >> Therefore it seems to me imperative that the NATO bombing should >>stop, and a multi-party conference of all the peoples of former Yugoslavia >>be called to settle differences between them on the basis of >>self-determination for all, not just for some, nor for some at the expense >>of others. This is the same principle that has been violated by >>US-sponsored peace processes elsewhere, notably in the Middle East. >> >> There is nothing about the current policy of bombing Serbian forces >>that will either guarantee democracy for Serbia or protect the Albanians >>who are still being treated horribly by Milosevic's forces. In its >>arrogance and ill-considered military deployment the US has forced NATO to >>go along with it, whereas it is quite clear that there is increasing >>disunity within the NATO ranks, not just Greece and Italy and Turkey, but >>also France and Germany. >> >> The greatest danger of all is that more people will be displaced, >>more lives lost, and more fragmentation will occur in places like >>Macedonia and Bosnia-Herzegovina. All this for the US to assert its will >>and to show the world who is boss. The humanitarian concerns expressed are >>the merest hypocrisy since what really counts is the expression of US >>power. >> >> What I find most distressing is that destruction is being wrought >>from the air along with a fastidiousness articulated about the loss of > >>American life that is positively revolting. Clinton knows well that >>Americans will not tolerate the loss of life for Americans. Yet he can >>destroy Yugoslavian lives with impunity from the safety of the ultimate in >>modern technology and airpower, with American pilots and bombers >>sanitizing their horror with the illusion of safety and distance. >> >> When will the smaller, lesser, weaker peoples realize that this >>America is to be resisted at all costs, not pandered or given in to >>naively? >> >> ******** >> >******************************************** >GreenPlanet Social Justice & Ecology Network >315 Pelissier Street, PO Box 548, Windsor ON Canada, N9A 6M6 >Voice: 519-973-1116 Fax 519-973-8360 >E-mail: riccawu-AT-mnsi.net >web page: http://www.mnsi.net/~cea >********************************************
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005