File spoon-archives/anarchy-list.archive/anarchy-list_1999/anarchy-list.9905, message 544


Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 20:37:51 -0400
From: *STRIDER* <chelovek-AT-mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: who is chuck really?


I think I get it now... 

*STRIDER*

Sean Gallagher wrote:
> 
> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
> 
> Oh, jeez louise ... The answer is that the individual who calls himself the
> UAP and runs the overthrow.com site is a delusional, self-aggrandizing,
> crypto-fascist, beret-wearing, Amazon.com partnering, latte-sipping,
> flame-baiting, attention-starved, bourgoise hacker wannabe with Napoleonic
> tendencies. Anyone with an ounce of rational thought capacity is on Bill's
> list of enemies.
> 
> Right, Kaiser Wilhelm?
> 
> ->-----Original Message-----
> ->From: owner-anarchy-list-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu
> ->[mailto:owner-anarchy-list-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu]On Behalf Of
> ->*STRIDER*
> ->Sent: Monday, May 17, 1999 5:52 PM
> ->To: anarchy-list-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu; wilke41-AT-hotmail.com
> ->Subject: who is chuck really?
> ->
> ->
> ->Hey, I just read this in the overthrow.com site. What the fuck is up
> ->w/this?
> ->Chuck
> ->
> ->
> ->
> ->This is just a heads-up warning to any anarchist or leftist groups that
> ->may
> ->run across this man. We're not sure exactly what his deal is, whether he
> ->is
> ->jsut a very strong UAP opponent for some personal reason, or whether
> ->he is an actual employed disruptive agent, but this man has deliberately
> ->spread lies about UAP to other anarchist and leftist groups, and has
> ->deliberately attempted, on several occassions to keep the UAP from
> ->cooperating with other groups.
> ->MIke
> ->--
> ->********************************
> ->DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed herein are not
> ->necessarily those of my employer, not necessarily
> ->mine, and probably not necessary.
> ->********************************
> ->If we go to school to learn, and learning is knowledge, and knowledge is
> ->power, and
> ->power is corrupt, and corruption is crime, and crime doesn't pay, then
> ->why do
> ->we go to school?
> ->********************************

-- 
********************************
DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed herein are not
necessarily those of my employer, not necessarily
mine, and probably not necessary.
********************************
If we go to school to learn, and learning is knowledge, and knowledge is
power, and 
power is corrupt, and corruption is crime, and crime doesn't pay, then
why do 
we go to school?
********************************



   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005