Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 09:44:08 -0700 From: "Senex R. Rupicapra" <olgoat-AT-kdsi.net> Subject: Re: Pro-Life Anarchists? Andy wrote: > > Bakintheussr: > > > >>the relationship between a pregnant woman and a fetus > > >>is parasitical. The woman, and the woman alone, should > > >>be able to decide to be rid of the parasite at any time, > > >>for any reason. Period. > > Dave: > > I pointed out > > > >Come to think of it, human babies remain parasitical > > >long after birth. They are totally helpless and dependent, > > >they deprive you of sleep, and they puke on you. > > >Perhaps you would like this right to be rid of a parasite > > >extended further - say up to three years' old ? > > and he came back with > > > I was speaking in a biological sense. After birth it is no longer > > a biologically parasitical relationship. > > So, the logic of your position is that you are in favour > of disposing of a parasitical child up until birth ? > > Would that, in practice, mean up until _one minute_ > before birth ? > > Or one day ? > > **** **** > > .......or we could do it by number of centimeters dilated. > > In any case isn't breast feeding on the biologically parasitical side of > things? hell, we just got rid o the House Plant (younkest daughter) on the first o the month. at age 35 she finally got her own place. if i've knowed it was okay to off 'em so long as they parasites, i'd've gotten rid o her long ago. come to think on it i got a 53-year-old brother-in-law who probly still qualifies. thanks, guys, y've surely brightened up my day. this sounds likea great way to get rid o unwanted relatives-- retroactive abortions. imagine that. old (smiling with a new outlook) goat. "Quoi que vous fassiez, écrasez l'infâme, et aimez qui vous aime." --Voltaire ÐÏࡱá
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005