Date: 09 Dec 1999 01:36:00 +0200 From: ASWAD-AT-anarch.free.de (catkawin) Subject: Re: Filip4Mathilde Andy shared insights re weddings & burials on TV: > Avoiding royal events is bloody hard work. For Princess Margaret's wedding I > was in hospital having a plaster removed from my formerly broken leg by a > nurse watching the TV and carelessly ripping all the hairs off me. Princess > Anne's to Fog [so-called because he was thick and wet]Phillips , I was > hungover in bed so that was easy. Chazza and Di, I spent hours digging the > garden, while neighbours kept saying "OOOh you should go in - she looks > lovely"; Fergie and Andrew, I knocked down a wall, removed a toilet and > re-tiled half a kitchen; Diana's funeral I cycled along the Thames towpath > from Twickenham to Richmond, then over the bridge to Kew and Brentford, then > back again towards Ham Common over the ferry and home, and she still hadn't > been buried. These bouts of unaccustomed royal related exercise will kill me > soon. There's certainly pros and cons re watching that stuff on TV. One seems to be having plasters removed by absent-minded nurses. The "cure" for the next event also had pros and cons, while the third way of avoidance must have pleased your wife for having the garden done, same as what you did during the randy Andy do. Anyways, better be careful, given your age and that of Queen Mum, although they say alcohol preserves ;) Anyways, the local paper today wrote: The priest doing the wedding ceremony for the dumb future king of Belgium (actually, according to European prejudice, this will make him a great symbol for his fellow country persons) has investigations up against him for child molesting. The paper added that some parents of affected children watched the show on TV and couldn't believe that man doing the wedding. Probably his superiors thought that he might be trusted with weddings. As compared to baptisms, that is. Cynicism off. catkawin ## CrossPoint v3.11 ##
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005