From: Chaos912-AT-aol.com Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 01:29:06 EST Subject: Re: Top Anarchist Events of the Century In a message dated 12/27/99 5:31:58 PM Central Standard Time, dcombs-AT-bloomington.in.us writes: << Actually, you sound like a wuss. carp >> So lemme get this straight. Because I don't deem it necessary to destroy the lives of innocent people in order to show the government how much balls we have, I'm a wuss? Because I think that fighting the governments fascist, violent ways with violence is not only hypocritical, but self-destructive, I'm a wuss? Well here's what I think. Violence is the easy way out. If we destroy everything and kill everyone, then what do we have to worry about. Well then we're living in anarchy in a nation who's once beautiful landscapes are littered with dead and torn apart by assenine violence. Sounds peachy, eh? Instead, if peacful protestors can change the way the others think, and we rise up as a majority, we can live toghether. I think the wusses are those who protested in Washington. Those who didn't have the guts to stand up to the govenment and say "this is what we think." Those who simply destroyed that which they could not tolerate. Hate to say this, but thats what Hitler did. That's what Stalin did. If Anarchist will destroy that which opposes them, I think I'll go with the less violent side. You have the right to protest peacefully. The nation will give you that. Won't you give them the same right? Who's the "bigger man?" What happened in Seattle makes me believe it was the government. The government that doesn't destroy the lives of its citizens which go against it. Hell, if me thinking there's a better way than destroying everything makes me a wuss, then I think I'll change my name. Wussy Assed Chaos
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005