Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 00:44:15 +0000 From: Erik <anarchie-AT-buelinckx.net> Subject: Re: So What the Hell is "Left Anarchy"? At 15:16 -0500 04-01-2000, Chuck0 wrote: ...> >I'm not sure either, which is why I think we need to have an in depth >discussion on this topic. > Yes but still i didn't get any real explanation of Leftism. So for me the anti-Leftism still has the danger to get mixed up with the rightwing (as happened with factions of the greens, probably all over the western world). When Iain says leftism = state capitalism i'm afraid i can't agree. I've been considering myself as a person from the far left (just a bit farther than marxist-comunists because i can't accept a dictature of the proletariat or any state-like transitional period even for a second). I laways thought left was rather commonly agreed on term. F.i. Blair consideres hismelf to be mildly left: he ain't he's a liberal. But hen liberal in Belgium is completely different from liberal in the U$. Tatcher was a liberal and slept with a republican. So maybe i shouldn' ask for explanations about terms ;-) but hey why not. If by Leftism one means all those little groupuscules on the left fighting their petty fights, anarchism is even more part of it. Besides i also like the use of leftist as opposed to rightwing. The emerging fascism - once again - in Europe and elsewhere makes me wanting to describe myself as far left anarchist more and more. It helps defining borders that can't be crossed. Erik PS. "left anarchy" = "anarchy"
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005