Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 23:10:00 -0500 (CDT) From: DK Sanders-Weatherford <dksander-AT-comp.uark.edu> Subject: Re: Chomsky on A16 Anarchists... On Tue, 11 Apr 2000 SReidTweed-AT-aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 4/11/00 1:12:14 AM, dksander-AT-comp.uark.edu wrote: > > << define "normal". >> > > What does that have to do with anything? you said: > Academic language is normal English. i ask what do you mean by "normal" as in the phrase "normal english". > Different writing for different audiences. That was my point. what is this multitude of audiences we were discussing? who do you consider to be the audience for political writing? are only Certain Special People supposed to be the recipients of certain kinds of knowledge or opinions? is there a list? weren't we only discussing one kind of writing? and you wouldn't know a point if it were stuck up your ass. > Start paying > attention, you insolent shitstick. hahahahahahaha!!! pretty lame, there; what the hell IS a shitstick? something you suck on? insolent? do you even know what that means? (run and go look it up!) i could play this game; i could call you a fetid, maggot-ridden, phlegm covered possum ass, but i won't. > Huh? yep, that about sums you up. darla kay
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005