File spoon-archives/anarchy-list.archive/anarchy-list_2000/anarchy-list.0004, message 454


Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 23:58:30 -0500 (CDT)
From: DK Sanders-Weatherford <dksander-AT-comp.uark.edu>
Subject: Re:  Re: Chomsky on A16 Anarchists...


On Wed, 12 Apr 2000 SReidTweed-AT-aol.com wrote:
> << i ask what do you mean by "normal" as in the phrase "normal english". >>
> English as it is normally used.

you're saying that academic language is english as it is normally used?
apparently, you are an idiot.
this whole post of yours was the height of idiocy.

> You see, there are many kinds of books. Big books and small books.
> Books on gardening and books on engineering. Fat books, skinny books.
> Red books, green books...

hell, that doesn't even rhyme! 

> No one person could read every book in existence even if he or she 

i bet you could.  really.  you should try.

> So you *have to* learn if you want to understand anything complex. Some 
> things simply can't be "dumbed down." In recent years, for example, mysticism 

not true!  there is an ART to dumbing down and i am the master of that
art.  

> has received a huge boost from attempts to describe quantum mechanics
> in layman's terms. Dumbing QM down has removed it from the context of
> physics,

haha!  you bought into that quantum mechanics thing?  idiot.

> << are only Certain Special People supposed to be the recipients of
> certain kinds of knowledge or opinions? >>
> Yes, of course. 

pompous ass.

darla kay


   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005