Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 11:29:27 +0200
Subject: Re: Breasts in an anarchist society


At 23:51 15/6/00 , catkawin wrote:
>Quite incidentially, I saw a bloke yesterday which completely ruins your
>argument. He was wearing one of those really tight short trousers you're
>supposed to wear for cycling (don't know what they're called in English),
>uplifted with a wunderbum and padded, and he must have bought them about
>two sizes smaller than would have been recommendable... I mean, the only
>way to become just slightly more informative about what used to be called
>private parts would have been a picket reading: lengths: 2.5 cms, test. in
>diam.: 0.8 cms. No, I'm not being mischievous, the bloke really didn't
>have anything much to boast with, but nevertheless felt he should...

Hee "Pants so tight you could count the wrinkles in his cock". From some 
book somewhere.

bye
John