Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 11:21:23 -0400
Subject: Re: Slashdot on "No Logo."




I thought this one was thought provoking:
 http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=00/06/05/1455210&cid=250

At any rate, it seemed like pretty typical slashdot posting. I didn't read
anything depressing (I was cruising at +3), just pretty goofy.

I think the major point that was missed was that while some *good*
groups/companies/etc have logos (a black and red flag, anyone?) and that
seems hypocritical to only scream about corporate logos, bear in mind that
the book is about the pervasive nature of ads/logos/branding in society, not
about ads/logos in general.

mat

Michael Chisari wrote:

>    Check this review of "No Logo" by Naomi Klein on Slashdot.org:
>
>    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/06/05/1455210
>
>    I found some of the highest-rated responses to be very depressing.
>
>
>
> --
>
>  Michael Chisari         "Got a revolution behind my eyes,
>  mchisari-AT-usa.net         we got to get up and organize."
>
> ____________________________________________________________________
> Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1

HTML VERSION: