Subject: Re: The Co-optation of Feminism Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 14:51:23 PDT ><< Gee, most of the "self described" feminists I know would not fit >your >definition, because they want much more than equality. But what >the hell >is this talk about meeting a required definition? Did you >set up these >requirements? Where can I take the test? >> >aren't all "feminists" self described? i mean your right there is no >set >definition of feminism. Mattel could call barbie a feminist if they >wanted...does that mean she's a feminist? Man, I really need to stop these attempts at humor. The "self described" thing was just a reference to how all anarchists have lately been labeled in the media as "self described" or simply "anarchists." I was actually responding to the fact that these particular feminists would not fit Neuro's own officially licensed (tm) definition of feminism, contrary to my intuition. Kevin K. ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005