Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2000 13:41:07 -0500 From: Old Goat <olgoat-AT-kdsi.net> Subject: Re: Armed Struggle/ETA --------------D23A3328F0FC20DC3416BDAF danceswithcarp wrote: > At 11:46 PM 8/5/00 +0200, catkawin wrote: > > >A state of one's own may not be ultima ratio from an anarchist point of > >view, but who are we to tell people to continue living under repressive > >circumstances rather than demanding their own state? > > This raises a theoretical point I've wanted to ask about for years: If an > anarchist community were to be established in the midst of all of the > nations and states and if the anarchist community was independent of the > existing orders and had borders, would it not be a nation-state? probly so if it had borders. howsomever, were they nomadic folk, mebbe not. o course being nomadic (or semi - so) presents its own set o problems in that there always be folk about to complain that y're treading upon "our property". the laws o trespass can be pretty tough and are rather universal. y can die -- rather suddenly and without benefit o clergy -- from committing trespass if the PTB o the non - anarc community permit it -- as they often do. old goat "The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ, Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line, Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it." --Edward Fitzgerald ÐÏࡱá --------------D23A3328F0FC20DC3416BDAF
HTML VERSION:
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005