File spoon-archives/anarchy-list.archive/anarchy-list_2000/anarchy-list.0009, message 57


Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 23:25:07 -0700
From: *STRIDER* <strider-AT-fornits.com>
Subject: hactivism


This thanks to The Sonoma County Independent,
http://www.metroactive.com/sonoma/,
and Metro Publishing / Virtual Valley, Inc.  http://www.metroactive.com/


SONOMA COUNTY INDEPENDENT
August 31 - September 6, 2000

Cover: Virtual Vandals
A new generation of hacktivists blends old-left activism with high-tech tools.
http://www.metroactive.com/sonoma/hackers-0035.html


Virtual Vandals
[image]: http://www.metroactive.com/sonoma/gifs/cover-0035.jpg
credit Steven Verriest


Hacktivism takes to the cyberstreets

By David Cassel


IN EARLY MAY an activist calling himself "Reverend Billy" called for
thousands of computer owners to fire up their modems for an assault on
Starbucks. From unseen corners of the globe, they'd converge on the
company's website--hoping to overload it. Though the media portray hackers
as secretive, destructive intruders, some individuals and groups are openly
committing online attacks in the name of furthering specific causes. It can
be a symbolic massing on a Web page which, with enough participants, makes
it inaccessible to others--or more invasive "monkey-wrenching" to disable a
site's equipment.

Others just want to bypass government restrictions they see as unfair. But
they're all trying to fuse their passions to their technology, using the
power of the Internet to discover new forms of social protest.

In December a group called the Electrohippies(
http://www.gn.apc.org/pmhp/ehippies ) organized a "WTO virtual sit-in" that
overloaded the machines keeping the World Trade Organization's Web pages on
the Internet. The five U.K. activists estimate that over 452,000 people
swamped the site. (During the action, the group says, participants sent
them up to 900 e-mails each day.) Paul Mobbs, the group's co-founder and
media liaison, says they accomplished their goal- disrupting the World
Trade Organization's online presence for four- to five-hour stretches- and
reduced that site's overall speed by half.

In April the group launched an even more ambitious series of events,
protesting genetically modified crops. If you had a computer equipped with
a modem, you were already a potential co activist in their radical action.
A surprise "special action" began April Fool's Day with the media-friendly
name "Resistance Is Fertile." The Electrohippies called for an e-mail
campaign from April 3 to April 7 targeting 78 officials listed on the
Hippies' website--including U.S. Department of Agriculture communications
official Vic Powell--to build public pressure against genetically modified
foods. But the tactics remained so controversial that they called off their
main event that had been scheduled for the next week-- "an e-mail and
client-side denial of-service extravaganza"--after an online vote for the
action failed to muster a simple majority.

Meanwhile, authorities worry that a new international event could become
the target.

On Aug. 23, Australian Communications Minister Richard Alston announced
that computer experts will work around the clock during the upcoming Sydney
Olympics to keep out cyber hackers who might try to vandalize the games'
Web sites, even changing official results and the names of medal winners.

"You can't assume goodwill. You've got to proceed on the basis that there
will be people trying to cause difficulties and do your best to avoid
these," Alston told the Associated Press.

"We are not about to telegraph our punches."

There is good reason to fear virtual vandalism down under: Sydney is being
heralded as the first "Internet Olympics," with more than 275 million Net
users worldwide compared to 40 million just four years ago.

Disruption of the games would be a major coup for hackers, computer experts
say.


Symbolism vs. Damage

IT'S A NEW BREED of activism--wired and confrontational. Some question
whether it's really a desirable form of protest, but the Electrohippies are
hoping to defuse criticism by popularizing not just their tools, but a code
of ethics. They publicized their intentions before the attack--and also
issued a lengthy paper on the philosophy of it.

"These type[s] of actions are directly analogous to the type[s] of
demonstrations that take place across the world," reads "Occasional Paper
No. 1."

The group has always argued that the large numbers needed to have an impact
mean a "democratic guarantee" is inherent in the technique. "One or two
people do not make a valid demonstration," their website argues--"100,000
people do. . . .

"If there are not enough people supporting the action, it doesn't work."

They're seeking nothing less than a world where e-commerce is balanced by
e-protest--or at least where cyberspace isn't immune from public pressure.
Henry David Thoreau's "On the Duty of Civil Disobedience" is displayed
prominently on the group's website--surviving 152 years only to be taken up
by Internet activists.

But Mobbs acknowledges that much of the practical theory began with various
U.S. groups like the Electronic Disturbance Theatre that were supporting
the Zapatista National Liberation Army in 1998. Using tactics hardly more
complicated than repeatedly hitting the button on a Web browser to reload a
Web page, the group created a form of activism that was also part poetry.

It was often, as one website described it, "a symbolic gesture created to
increase awareness about the low-intensity war in Chiapas, Mexico."

Together, four activists, calling themselves an Internet performance art
group, had created a Web interface that would access the page for Mexico's
President Zedillo. After altering the page, the interface would seek bogus
addresses, so the browser would return messages like "human_rights not
found on this server."

The project--which they dubbed "FloodNet"(
http://www.thing.net/~rdom/ecd/ZapTact.html )--also filled the page's
access log with the names of people killed by government troops. "In an
artistic sense, this is a way of remembering and honoring those who gave
their lives in defense of their freedom," Ricardo Domingo wrote in an
online remembrance. There were nine actions between April and December of
1998, adds Carmin Karasic, a Boston-based activist- culminating with a mass
action on the website for the Mexican Stock Exchange.

But were the actions effective?

Yes, Domingo argued--measured not by their technical effect on the targeted
sites, but by the attention they brought to the Zapatistas. The website for
their Electronic Disturbance Theatre points out that their activism
tool--which the group released in early 1999 to sow more online
activism--"emerged from and serves a community which genuinely requires the
development of such attention weapons as a matter of survival."

Other online documents describe their actions as a show of presence that
sends the Mexican government a message: "We are numerous, alert, and
watching carefully."

The technique is now becoming more common. Attackers used a variation in
February for overwhelming assaults on several high-profile sites, including
Yahoo! and CNN, and in mid March a similar attack temporarily disabled the
website for the FBI. But Karasic argues that, like the protests of the
Electrohippies, FloodNet's action drew its validity only from the number of
people showing support.

"It was only actualized through thousands and thousands of participants,"
she remembers. "It was meaningless without the masses." Popular support
transforms a random act of vandalism into a show of presence, Karasic
argues.

"This is an important difference from the single hacker/hacktivist who
takes down a server with a single script," she says.

For hacktivists, like the two Cloverdale teens who hacked their way into
sensitive U.S. government sites a couple of years ago, damage is often less
important than symbolism. Hacker Reverend Billy's early May action against
the Starbucks site had almost no noticeable effect, according to some
observers.

"Whenever . . . I, myself, went to visit starbucks.com, I did not have any
trouble accessing them," concedes Ricardo Domingo, whose group supported
the action. But that's almost beside the point. "The true goal of the
action is to generate focus on the issue of [Starbucks'] policy to take
over neighborhoods with its loss-leader branding." Announcements for the
action even included information about Zapatista settlements in Mexico
facing an ominous military presence.

"The Zapatista communities now have as many military camps around as we
have Starbucks in Manhattan," says Domingo, who feels the action helped
their effort "to spread to levels of information about our world under the
signs of neoliberalism."


A Bad Idea?

THE ELECTROHIPPIES' Paul Mobbs agrees, cautioning that groups overloading
e-commerce sites shouldn't be overmalicious. "If you want to be effective,
it's more justifiable to disrupt a server for one day and make your point,
rather than dragging the action on for a few days and cause more
generalized disruption."

The tactics aren't universally supported. "The Electrohippies are trying to
rationalize Denial of Service attacks and violate the First Amendment
privileges of their opponents," wrote a hacker named Oxblood Ruffin, in an
essay that the Electrohippies agreed to display on their website (
http://www.gn.apc.org/pmhp/ehippies/files/op1-cdc.htm ). And the discussion
continues elsewhere on the Internet.

The Hacktivism mailing list ( www.hacktivism.tao.ca [note: this address
doesn't work - see the ending part of this message / *strider]  -AT--AT- *** -AT--AT- )
--an e-mail discussion list started last summer to grapple with this
combination of hacking and activism--has carried debate about whether such
attacks are nothing more than glorified censorship, with activists simply
hampering the opposing side's right to speak.

But there's not a clear consensus. "It depends on the target," one message
countered during the list's first weeks last summer. "In many cases there
is not a level playing field, especially when the opponent is a large
corporation or government."

Some even argue that this evolution may have been inevitable. "For us the
idea of hackers as activists seemed obvious," says a spokesman for RTMark,
an online collective distributing funds globally for anticorporate
activities.

"Too many were becoming experts in defending corporate privacy rights
rather than using their skills to fight those rights and others."

By the fall of 1998, Wired News reported that a group called X-Pilot had
even rewritten text on the Mexican government's website. Such incidents
offer evidence that groups and individuals sometimes move beyond
overloading the machines hosting Web pages. Attacks can be more
technical--more hack than activism--raising again the issue of just how far
an online protest should go.

Oxblood Ruffin--whom some credit with coining the word hacktivism--notes
that one Hong Kong group of hacktivists, called the Hong Kong Blondes, now
numbers over 100 members, many with positions within China's Communist
Party. Reached recently for a comment, he added that he now distinguishes
between hacktivism and simple "[h]activism."

"The former seeks to remedy the Net of bad code, restriction, lack of
access, etc.; the latter seeks to use the Net as an agent for social
justice on the ground through various protest actions or as a publicity
medium."

He says the distinction is important for assessing groups online. "There is
more [h]activism than hacktivism," he writes.

"The Electrohippies are starting to get into electronic civil disobedience,
although I very much disagree with their methodology."

In contrast, he points out that his own group is currently working on a way
to e-mail Chinese Internet users Web pages that are officially banned by
their government.

Meanwhile, hacker websites like http://www.2600.com and AntiOnline preserve
screen shots of dozens of websites that they've learned were compromised
and rewritten. Attackers sometimes leave only vain blustering with a
pastiche of names--a kind of online graffiti.

But in other instances, there's an unmistakable message. Earlier in 1998 a
hacker broke into the system of the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre in
Bombay, India, changing its Web page into a protest of India's nuclear
weapons tests, as well as stealing its e-mail.

The Electronic Disturbance Theatre issued a statement of support for the
hacker's actions, and despite the hands-on approach, even the leader of the
Hong Kong Blondes applauded the action in an online interview conducted by
Oxblood Ruffin.

"I view the BARC intrusion as something positive," he told Ruffin, "because
it will draw attention to the situation and cause more discussion about a
serious issue."

MAYBE THE NEW technology is just amplifying the impulses of the people who
use it now. "The Acteal Massacre in December 1997 moved me to tears,"
remembers Carmin Karasic--and her work on the Electronic Disturbance
Theatre was the ultimate result.

But her preparations for the demonstrations also harnessed the Net in
another way. While the guerrilla army was using the Internet to deliver
news of its struggle to an online audience, Karasic's own contingent was
using the Net to develop forms of support.

"Our collaboration was 100 percent Internet-linked," Karasic
remembers--"all e-mail exchanges." To this day, Karasic notes, "I think I'm
still the only Electronic Disturbance Theatre member who has met all of us
face-to-face."

Though it's hard to measure, it's possible that cyber-causes may also reach
those with the same passions more quickly--allowing political sentiments to
be better focused. Online networking has been cited as a factor in the
large turnout for the WTO protests in Seattle. And though it's hard to
quantify, the concept of hacktivism itself may be spreading, possibly even
evolving.

On the hacktivism mailing list, Bronc Buster announced he was working with
human rights groups and hacker groups on a suite of applications, released
at the hacker convention "DefCon" this summer.

"It shows that hacktivism is a real way to use the Net to blend activism
and technology in a positive way," he argued, "while helping people at the
same time." And elsewhere, an activist who goes by the name RE:no says he's
developed a "Mail-O-Matic" for use in online actions--"a mail washer, to
send extracts from books explaining our state of mind."

Almost by definition, any pursuit of hacktivism will require a constantly
updated set of tools. (The Electronic Disturbance Theatre's website notes
that the Department of Defense wrote a counterprogram to try to thwart one
of the group's actions.) "We must be inventive with each problem which we
encounter," RE:no argues. But even when those tools lie dormant, their
potential is felt. RE:no believes activists should keep them in
reserve--"as an armed peace tool"--the way the Zapatistas remain armed "as
a symbolic gesture of voice."

And the hacktivism continues. After funding FloodNet, RTMark moved on to
other forms of online activism, creating a doppelgänger of the official
website for GATT and championing European art group eToy in its fight with
toy retailer eToys. Pigdog.org called on network administrators to block
Doubleclick ads from reaching its users. Last summer on the Hacktivism
list, Ricardo Domingo even announced new online actions in August of 1999
to commemorate the birthday of Emiliano Zapata.

Whether or not hacktivists can stay in the code race, escalating tactics in
response to countermeasures, remains to be seen. But their actions have at
least raised that possibility- along with the thorny issues that accompany
it.

While it may be unclear whether online masses can make a lasting impact on
social policy, there are individuals who believe it's possible and are
working to find a way to make it happen- which is, in itself, a kind of
first step.

As Thoreau himself once said, "In the long run men hit only what they aim at."



[ Sonoma County | MetroActive Central | Archives ]


>From the August 31-September 6, 2000 issue of the Sonoma County Independent.

Copyright © Metro Publishing Inc. Maintained by Boulevards New Media.


-----------------------
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is
distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and
educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
-----------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-AT--AT- *** -AT--AT-

NOTE *** if you go to http://lists.tao.ca/ and type in your e-mail address,
then go a little further you get this:


Info File For List <hacktivism>

Hacktivism list FAQ (Version 0.1) Grugnog <grugnog-AT-tao.ca>

The latest edition of this FAQ can always be retrieved from:

http://www.tao.ca/~grugnog/hacktivism/list-faq.txt

Changes: none (first edition)

------------------------------

Subject: 1. Introduction and Intent

This FAQ aims to answer some of the most popular frequently asked questions
about the Hacktivism e-mail list. It doesn't attempt to answer questions on
hacktivism, just the e-mail list.

------------------------------

Subject: 2. Table of Contents

1. Introduction and Intent 2. Table of Contents 3. What is the Hacktivism
list? 4. How do I unsubscribe? 5. How do I subscribe? 6. What should I post
to the list? 7. What should I not post to the list? 8. What messages should
I not bother replying to? 9. What is spam, and how do I combat it?

------------------------------

Subject: 3. What is the Hacktivism list?

The Hacktivism e-mail list is for posting news or analysis about hacktivism
and for discussion possibly leading to a better understanding of what
'hacktivism' means (as a word and in a tactical, ethical and practical
sense). This statement will change as the list develops. To send messages
to the list simply address them to hacktivism-AT-tao.ca

------------------------------

Subject: 4. How do I unsubscribe?

To remove yourself from the e-mail list, and stop getting messages from it
you have to unsubscribe. There are two ways of doing this:

1: You can unsubscribe by sending a mail to hacktivism-request-AT-lists.tao.ca
with no subject line and the command "unsubscribe" in the main body
(without the quotes). Tips: * Don't send unsubscribe requests to the main
list - this is infuriating for everyone else on the list, and won't get you
unsubscribed any faster. * Make sure you send messages in plain text only,
and you turn off your signatures - check your e-mail options. * Don't
include your e-mail address after the command. Make sure you are using the
same e-mail address you subscribed from. * Check both of them again, and if
it still doesn't work them e-mail me (grugnog-AT-tao.ca) and I will
unsubscribe you manually.

2: You can also unsubscribe by going to the web site < http://lists.tao.ca/
> and following the instructions. This is probably the quickest and easiest
way to unsubscribe for most people.

------------------------------

Subject: 5. How do I subscribe?

If you want to join the list, you need to subscribe. There are two ways of
doing this:

1: You can subscribe by sending a mail to hacktivism-request-AT-lists.tao.ca
with no subject line and the command "subscribe" in the main body (without
the quotes). Tips: * Make sure you send messages in plain text only, and
you turn off your signatures - check your e-mail options. * Don't include
your e-mail address after the command. Make sure you are using the same
e-mail address you subscribed from.

2: You can also subscribe by going to the web site < http://lists.tao.ca/ >
and following the instructions. This is probably the quickest and easiest
way to subscribe for most people.

------------------------------

Subject: 6. What should I post to the list?

Do post: * News on hacktivism * Your views on what hacktivism is, and any
ethical, tactical or practical issues that come to mind * Replies to any of
the above posts! This list will change as the list culture develops.

------------------------------

Subject: 7. What shouldn't I post to the list?

Don't post: * Unsubscribe requests (see above) * Spam (see below) *
Blatantly off-topic material (I won't try and define this for now) *
Material which will attract unneccesary attention to yourself, others or
the list providers from the authorities, such as specific hacking
techniques, or details of illegal project organisation. * Flames: try and
keep debate reasonably calm, please don't start flame wars! If you do,
please consider take taking them off list! * Messages people can't read.
Try and avoid messages in HTML or messages with attachments. Plain text
rules! This list will change as the list culture develops.

I refuse to censor this list in any way. If the list provider (or their
provider, ect) forces removal of any information I will endevour to ensure
it is available elsewhere on the net.

------------------------------

Subject: 8. What messages should I not bother replying to?

Don't bother replying to: * Unsubscribe requests (see above) * Spam (see
below) * Blatant flames * Peoples replies to any of the above!

If people reply to any of these, or the replies to any of these (ect) it
merely increases the volume of the list - creating a chain reaction, but
rarely solves the problems! If you have to reply, please think about
replying off list.

------------------------------

Subject: 9. What is spam, and how do I combat it?

Spam is 'unsolicited commercial e-mail', and can occasionally get postedto
e-mail lists. The main thing is not to reply to it (even if it says send a
'REMOVE' to get off the list) - all this does is confirms your e-mail
address. Beyond that you can either ignore it, or report the spammer to
their ISP: for more information see < http://spam.abuse.net/ >

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Key searches at /RENEGADE/ -
http://fornits.com/renegade/#key

Search /RENEGADE/ for articles that mention hacktivism
http://fornits.com/renegade/peaars.cgi?HACK

Search /RENEGADE/ for articles that mention ENVIRONMENT
http://fornits.com/renegade/peaars.cgi?keywords=enviro&increment=weeks&many=26
[only articles for the last six months will be indexed]

Search /RENEGADE/ for articles that mention HUMAN RIGHTS
http://fornits.com/renegade/peaars.cgi?keywords=human+rights&how=phrase&incremen
t=weeks&many=26
[last 6 months only]

/RENEGADE/ Search - GO TO:  http://fornits.com/renegade/peaars.cgi?
and just type in your topic.  For differing results you may uncheck
"article" and search on just "subject," use "any word" or "phrase," etc.
/RENEGADE/ also has "time-frame" in the search, so you can tailor
your results that way, too.

-----


Peace!

*STRIDER*       Sector Air Raid Warden at /RENEGADE/

         /RENEGADE/ news_service:  http://fornits.com/renegade/
        DEDICATED TO SPIRIT, TRUTH, PEACE, JUSTICE, AND FREEDOM
     e-list info: http://fornits.com/renegade/peaars.cgi?fetch=3763
        usenet: news:alt.thebird   news:misc.activism.progressive
         chat: http://jupiter.beseen.com/chat/rooms/i/1055/
                e-mail: mailto:strider-AT-fornits.com
                          strider-AT-fornits.com

    WHEN SPIDERS UNITE, THEY CAN TIE DOWN A LION  -- Ethiopian Proverb



   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005