From: "Old Goat" <olgoat-AT-kdsi.net> Subject: Re: Fw: tad kepley (somewhat off topic) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 14:03:15 -0600 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. Nope, Sprout, I wasn't (intentionally) implying that this yo-yo is KB, just that there is a similarity in MOs: that the best defence is to be offensive. I wonder if these semi-intellectual show-offs realise how painfully obvious they are. As my 11 year old granddaughter says: "TRAAAAANSparent!" Cheers, og ----- Original Message ----- From: Ze Sprout To: Old Goat Cc: anarchy-list-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ; cowlick77-AT-aol.com Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 13:11 Subject: Re: Fw: tad kepley (somewhat off topic) At 11:14 -0600 19-03-2001, Old Goat wrote: >I got this private post in response to my latest posting to the list. Looks like I hit a nerve, neh? Seems like I recall a list contributor who, if his intellect got questioned, resorted to inane, vitriolic, ad hominem attacks. Do the initials Kaiser Bill ring a bell? >--og shit, i did't get any private mail it couldn't be KB. one of the things that made tad kepley after all sympathetic is the way he ripped off KB some money. this can be found in the -AT--list archives somewhere, or people with better memory can maybe tell. erik
HTML VERSION:
From: Ze SproutTo: Old GoatSent: Monday, March 19, 2001 13:11Subject: Re: Fw: tad kepley (somewhat off topic)At 11:14 -0600 19-03-2001, Old Goat wrote:
>I got this private post in response to my latest posting to the list. Looks like I hit a nerve, neh? Seems like I recall a list contributor who, if his intellect got questioned, resorted to inane, vitriolic, ad hominem attacks. Do the initials Kaiser Bill ring a bell?
>--og
shit, i did't get any private mail
it couldn't be KB. one of the things that made tad kepley after all sympathetic is the way he ripped off KB some money.
this can be found in the -AT--list archives somewhere, or people with better memory can maybe tell.
erik
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005