Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:38:40 -0500
From: danceswithcarp <dcombs-AT-bloomington.in.us>
Subject: Re: tad kepley (somewhat off topic)



At 01:27 AM 3/19/2001 -0500, cowlick77-AT-aol.com wrote:
>hmmm, (here i say "hmmm", to denote my condescending attitude toward someone
>less aware than i of certain fundamental truths)  hmmm,  it should have been
>obvious, (but in anarcho-pedant land,

Huh-uh.  Huh-uh-huh.  Huh-huh.

You said "pedant."

Only the tadster hisself would ever use the wird "pedant" on the 
anarchy-list.  Check the archives.

Hi, tad.


carpo

HTML VERSION: