From: "roger" <gracchus-AT-worldnet.att.net> Subject: Re: Protest Groups Breach Security at Quebec Summit Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 18:50:31 -0700 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. tacitus put it succinctly: Who will guard the guardians? but i respect taking to the streets with a point of view, as in otterwall. NTO was fun as hell here in seattle (course we only had a few hundred cops while now the man mobilzes thousands; the state learns fast). focused dissent can be both cathartic for the participants and generative of popular conscienceness in the society at large. legends are no less real for not being real. mostly, i miss f. leon. he had a point. the mardi gras seattle riots and the cincy mess are all too indicative of the ill health of our body politic. very troubling. roger ----- Original Message ----- From: Old Goat To: Chuck0 ; anarchy-list-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 2:09 PM Subject: Re: Protest Groups Breach Security at Quebec Summit Yeah but, guys, if we do away with The State who will enforce trade restrictions and embargos? Who will say, "no" to free trade? Who will bell the cat? Who will put the "bop" in the bop - she - bop? Or have I misunderstood, is it just the "rich guys" we wanna be rid of? I'll go for that if you'll let me define "rich guys". M. Vieux Bouc
HTML VERSION:
----- Original Message -----From: Old GoatSent: Friday, April 20, 2001 2:09 PMSubject: Re: Protest Groups Breach Security at Quebec SummitYeah but, guys, if we do away with The State who will enforce trade restrictions and embargos? Who will say, "no" to free trade? Who will bell the cat? Who will put the "bop" in the bop - she - bop?Or have I misunderstood, is it just the "rich guys" we wanna be rid of? I'll go for that if you'll let me define "rich guys".M. Vieux Bouc
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005