Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 15:54:54 -0400
From: kmart <thoucynic-AT-crosswinds.net>
Subject: Re: The Alaskan Idiot moves his mouth...


Michael Lewis wrote:
> Young warned against rushing to the conclusion that Middle Eastern
> terrorists were responsible. "There's some possibility," he said, "that the
> attacks are linked to the protests against the World Trade Organization,
> another of which is scheduled for later this month in Washington D.C."



And how is this any more absurd than blindly assuming Bin Ladin did it? Or
that Palestinian resistance did it?

Examine fundamental assumptions, what makes one hypothesis more likely than
another ?