From: threejaguar-AT-yahoo.com
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 08:30:27 -0800
Subject: Re: the reply-to setting on the anarchy list


On 6 Nov 01, at 19:58, Joshua Houk wrote:

> 
> 
> threejaguar-AT-yahoo.com wrote:
> 
> > I would support putting only the a-list address in the "from:" and
> > "reply-to:" fields, deleting all "cc:" entries, and tacking the original
> > "cc:" and the original "from:" addresses to the bottom of the list
> > message for the curious. Auto stripping html/rich text junk is also good
> > ( bleem <*> pattern text? ).
> 
> No, no, no, you've got it all wrong.  Move the "cc:" headers to the
> front, keep the "reply-no:" at the end of the message, and automatically
> set the "x-no-archive:" to "yes" and insert "XXXNOSPAMXXX" into everyone's
> email address.  Oh, and make .sigs mandatory.
> 
> > Perhaps honoring a line in the message demanding "no edit", by
> > forwarding the message unchanged, would help answer censorship
> > objections.
> 
> Personally, I'd like a "no reply" feature.  Gotta have the last word.
> 

Please teach me how to implement this immediatly!


> > This would possibly eliminate two of the latest sources of message
> > format flamebait.
> 
> But unsubscribing's much easier, neh?
> 
> <img src="bullet.gif">
> <b>TEST</b>
> <p>
> 
> <subscript>joshua h</subscript>

Yea, but endless flamewars over formatting are much more fun.

Looks like the list server deleted your gif. So sorry....



Regards,

Kristopher K. Barrett

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free -AT-yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com