File spoon-archives/anarchy-list.archive/anarchy-list_2002/anarchy-list.0210, message 18


Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 22:29:56 +0200
From: Ze Sprout <anarchie-AT-buelinckx.net>
Subject: Re: Spam Green Mitch-campaign [was: Re: (no subject)]


At 16:10 -0400 01-10-2002, Mitchel Cohen wrote:
...>Now, if you'd like to get into an INFORMED discussion about anarchy and green politics, that might prove interesting. And, you might be surprised but what you'd hear.

any informed discussion about anarchy and green politics sadly involves the experiences of green experiences in some european countries. well, instead of being involved, they bend over so easily to be -with consent- screwed by their liberal -european style- or social-democrat government partners, because what counts in green politics is not the realisation of any programme but their eagerness to be part of the power elite. i witnessed this in local town politics as well as in national politics. and i'm afraid the support for types like Nader in th u$a indicates this to be inherent in green politics worldwide.

any informed discussion about anarchy and green politics should stress that as soon as the greens aim for participation in the electoral process the (even very limited) anarchist elements of their politics are gone.

Erik
-- 

===========================================================================Ze Sprout  <anarchie-AT-buelinckx.net>
amour & anarchie & amour & anarchie
===========================================================================
   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005