Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2003 12:16:42 -0600 From: Sandi and Scott Spaeth <vespass-AT-swbell.net> Subject: Re: Fw: rights (was ...talks shite) At 06:13 AM 2/2/03 +0000, you wrote: >Why can't jennifer say that society is an organism and be right??? > > >I'm an organism made up of millions of tiny cells that are keenly >interested in self-preservation. > >Society is an organism made up of millions of individuals keenly >interested in self-preservation. > > >Except cells don't live under a "government", and the don't pay taxes. >Bryan. But cells can't fucking exist on their own, while an individual can live without a society, Cells have no independent wills or desires while an individual does. Cells can't decide to form or dissolve an organism to suit best their own individual needs, but multiple individuals can. Society as an organism isn't a new analogy, but that doesn't make it any less lousy. That analogy is what lets those who choose to consider themselves the "brains" of society sacrifice individuals in the name of "the good of the whole". Just like an animal might chew it's own leg off when caught in a trap, Leaders can sacrifice those portions of society that hold them back from where they want to go. Society as an organism is anti-human, statist and more than a little bit psychotic. To the degree that people form social structures, those structures should exist for the benefit of the individuals involved and not vice-versa. Those structures should be created, modified and abolished to suit the needs and desires of the individuals who voluntarily comprise it. Of course "should be" isn't "are" thanks to the widespread belief in a bad analogy. Hence my hostility. cheers, scott
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005