File spoon-archives/anarchy-list.archive/anarchy-list_2003/anarchy-list.0303, message 540


Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 17:09:53 -0800 (PST)
From: Ali Kazmi <thekazmis2001-AT-yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Sum it...


Carp wrote.
> 
> Where will the left come down if Saddam does use
> toxins?

Well, don't attack Iraq. And we won't mention the DU
armament, Iraquies will no longer need to smoke to get
lung cancer.

No one loves Saddam. He is an evil dictator in the old
banana republic style, and anyone detaching his head
from his shoulders will get a cigar from me. 

but.

This war has nothing to do with Saddam. After 91 and
the sanctions, Iraq couldn't afford to catch a flu,
let alone stock pile anthrax. And even if he does it
will be for use against his own people.  Currently he
is not even a threat to his neighbors. He is not a
threat to American Lives. The only one killing
Americans will be Shrub. And please remember, whatever
chemical and bio weapons Iraq had before 91 were
supplied by your friendly Unka Sam and best buddy
Rumsfeld.

He didn't use them in '91 when we KNOW that he had
them. 

Hypothetical question.
If a "coalition of willing" forms i.e. rest of the
world and attacks USA to remove a insane head of
state, do you think America will shirk from using
nuclear, bio and chem weapons? 

Currently the only scary bio/chem/nuke armed country
in the world is USA. (and NK but, hey, everyone is
ignoring it so lets also.)

Cheers.

Ali


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online
http://webhosting.yahoo.com

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005