From: "Heather" <Heather-AT-teknopunx.co.uk> Subject: Who is the grandson of a Nazi collaborator; Bush or Hussein? Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 21:00:28 -0000 Liberty or Death? Who is the grandson of a Nazi collaborator; Bush or Hussein? Do the following excerpts about Hitler (from a 1962 encyclopedia article) sound in any way familiar today? "A major concern was to alert the country to the perils of the "Red terror" in order to cement his own position. On the night of Feb. 27, 1933, the Reichstag was set afire. The Nazis immediately laid the arson to a Communist plot and, in the ensuing elections, profited greatly from the trumpedup charge." "In his attempt to achieve this goal, he established a secret police (the Gestapo) to spy on the German people, concentration camps to break their will, and a "Ministry of Propoganda and Enlightenment" to reshape their thinking." "One of his greatest triumphs came on Sept. 29, 1938, when the premiers of Great Britain and France and Benito Mussolini met at Munich and agreed to the surrender of the Sudetenland by Czechoslovakia. By the middle of October, German troops had occupied the area, and Hitler prepared for the next "crisis"." The Ten Planks Of The Terrorist Manifesto [otherwise known as "the Bush Doctrine"] http://www.topica.com/lists/Djehuti/read/message.html?mid=1712360466&sort=d& start=1538 By now many must have heard of the warnings of "terrorist" retaliation in response to Iraqi "liberation" showing just how far people are willing to go in support of absurd notions of self-justification. Who would retaliate against liberation? No one of course. But terroristic subjugation has always been a cause of violent response. To refer to a people's subjugation as being liberation is an insult that smacks of something straight out of George Orwell. Yet, is this not the consistent history of such liberators? Did not such liberators free millions from their ancestral homelands in order to benefit their children with forced labor, denied employment, and over representation in the prison system? Did not such liberators free millions of others of their lands and sovereignty that their children could benefit from the same forms of discrimination and restrictions on federally controlled reservations? From the very beginning, the most liberal of these liberators had expressed clear sentiments of self-justification in the "benefit" of others. "Nobody wishes more than I do to see... proofs [exhibited] that nature has given to our black brethren talents equal to those of the other colors of men, and that the appearance of a want of them is owing merely to the degraded condition of their existence both in Africa and America. I can add with truth that nobody wishes more ardently to see a good system commenced for raising the condition both of their body and mind to what it ought to be as fast as the imbecility of their present existence, and other circumstances which cannot be neglected, will admit." --Thomas Jefferson to Benjamin Banneker, 1791. "The improvement of the blacks in body and mind, in the first instance of their mixture with the whites, has been observed by every one, and proves that their inferiority is not the effect merely of their condition of life." Thomas Jefferson: Notes on Virginia Q.XIV, 1782. "This unfortunate difference of color, and perhaps of faculty, is a powerful obstacle to the emancipation of these people." --Thomas Jefferson: Notes on Virginia Q.XIV, 1782. "It will probably be asked, Why not retain and incorporate the blacks into the State [instead of colonizing them]? Deep rooted prejudices entertained by the whites, ten thousand recollections by the blacks of the injuries they have sustained, new provocations, the real distinctions which nature has made, and many other circumstances will divide us into parties and produce convulsions which will probably never end but in the extermination of the one or the other race." --Thomas Jefferson: Notes on Virginia Q.XIV, 1782. "In truth, the ultimate point of rest and happiness for [the Indians] is to let our settlements and theirs meet and blend together, to intermix and become one people, incorporating themselves with us as citizens of the U.S. This is what the natural progress of things will of course bring on, and it will be better to promote than retard it. Surely it will be better for them to be identified with us and preserved in the occupation of their lands, than be exposed to the many casualties which may endanger them while a separate people." --Thomas Jefferson to Benjamin Hawkins, 1803. "[To] incorporate with us as citizens of the United States... is certainly the termination of their history most happy for themselves; but in the whole course of this it is essential to cultivate their love. As to their fear, we presume that our strength and their weakness is now so visible that they must see we have only to shut our hand to crush them, and that all our liberalities to them proceed from motives of pure humanity only." --Thomas Jefferson William Henry Harrison, 1803. "Convinced of its soundness, I feel it consistent with pure morality to lead [the Indians] towards [becoming citizens,] to familiarize them to the idea that it is for their interest to cede lands at times to the United States, and for us to procure gratifications to our citizens from time to time by new acquisitions of land." --Thomas Jefferson to Benjamin Hawkins, 1803. "In order peaceably to counteract [their] policy [of refusing absolutely all further sale of their land], and to provide an extension of territory which the rapid increase of our numbers will call for, two measures are deemed expedient. First: to encourage them to abandon hunting, to apply to the raising stock, to agriculture and domestic manufactures, and thereby prove to themselves that less land and labor will maintain them in this, better than in their former mode of living. The extensive forest necessary in the hunting life will then become useless, and they will see advantage in exchanging them for the means of improving their farms and of increasing their domestic comforts. Secondly: to multiply trading-houses among them, and place within their reach those things which will contribute more to their domestic comfort than the possession of extensive but uncultivated wilds. Experience and reflection will develop to them the wisdom of exchanging what they can spare and we want, for what we can spare and they want. In leading them thus to agriculture, to manufactures, and civilization; in bringing together their and our settlements, and in preparing them ultimately to participate in the benefits of our government, I trust and believe we are acting for their greatest good." --Thomas Jefferson: Confidential Message on Western Exploration, 1803. "Habits of industry, easy subsistence, attachment to property, are necessary to prepare their minds for the first elements of science, and afterwards for moral and religious instruction. To begin with the last has ever ended either in effecting nothing, or ingrafting bigotry on ignorance, and setting them to tomahawking and burning old women and others as witches." --Thomas Jefferson to James Pemberton, 1807. "The plan of civilizing the Indians is undoubtedly a great improvement on the ancient and totally ineffectual one of beginning with religious missionaries. Our experience has shown that this must be the last step of the process. The following is what has been successful: 1st, to raise cattle, etc., and thereby acquire a knowledge of the value of property; 2d, arithmetic, to calculate that value; 3d, writing, to keep accounts, and here they begin to enclose farms, and the men to labor, the women to spin and weave; 4th, to read 'Aesop's Fables' and 'Robinson Crusoe' are their first delight." --Thomas Jefferson to James Jay, 1809. "No nation rejecting our friendship, and commencing wanton and unprovoked war against us, shall ever after remain within our reach; it shall never be in their power to strike us a second time." --Thomas Jefferson: Address to Indian Nations, 1808. "We have cut off all possibility of intercourse and of mutual aid, and may pursue at our leisure whatever plan we find necessary to secure ourselves against the future effects of their savage and ruthless warfare. The confirmed brutalization, if not the extermination of this race in our America, is therefore to form an additional chapter in the English history of the same colored man in Asia, and of the brethren of their own color in Ireland, and wherever else Anglo-mercantile cupidity can find a two-penny interest in deluging the earth with human blood." --Thomas Jefferson to Alexander von Humboldt, 1813. "The interested and unprincipled policy of England [in the War of 1812] has defeated all our labors for the salvation of these unfortunate people. They have seduced the greater part of the tribes within our neighborhood, to take up the hatchet against us, and the cruel massacres they have committed on the women and children of our frontiers taken by surprise, will oblige us now to pursue them to extermination, or drive them to new seats beyond our reach." --Thomas Jefferson to Alexander von Humboldt, 1813. As the most liberal leader of the so-called "liberators" had himself been of a self-justified imperialist mindset, it should be of no surprise that lesser leaders have so easily continued in this imperialist tradition. Such Yurugu mentality ever sees itself as possessing an inherent right to all it desires while vilifying anything to stand in its way. Even in its pacifist expression, no evil can be accounted to those who carry out evil objectives. Such people claim to oppose a war but to remain in support of troops. After all, are not such troops innocent? Like the Nazis, are they not just following orders? When they fire missles, when they fire bullets, when they drop bombs, when they burn homes, when they bulldoze trenches of living bodies, and when they utter ethnic slurs in the process of raping women whose cries will never be heard before an International World Court, are they not just innocent red-blooded Americans serving their country with honor? Should legally mature adults be held morally accountable for bringing about the unjustified deaths of others? Should so-called "liberators" not be expected to have exercised their free will in participating in such atrocities? Yet pacifists of a Yurugu mentality would excuse such decisions when it comes to the soldiers of their own nation while condemning all others who would do the same. The safety of those who would freely chose to kill in the service of an unjustified attack are of great concern to many pacifists (though the safety of soldiers who would justifiably defend their own land is never expressed). However, one cannot oppose theft while being in support of thieves, one cannot oppose rape while being in support of rapists, and one cannot oppose murder while being in support of murderers. It doesn't matter if one is unjustifiably killing under the red, white, and black in Kuwait or under the red, white, and blue in Iraq, a murderer is a murderer, and no honor can be accorded to such criminals of humanity. When a crime boss is found to be guilty of having issued a hit on a victim, those convicted of having carried out the order will not be seen as being innocent. One cannot be opposed to a crime while being in support of the perpetrators of the crime. An amoral excuse of just following orders will not be upheld in a court of law. The baby-killers of Iraq are no more innocent than the baby-killers of Vietnam or any other place to have been unjustifiably attacked by America. When pacifists declare their support of soldiers engaged in an attack that the pacifists are opposed to, they are expressing the self-exonerated perspective that such terrorist acts are merely a moral embarrassment incapable of truly being criminal for an American. Such Yurugu mentality, even in its pacifist form, goes hand in hand with the Ten Planks of the Fourth Reich's Terrorist Manifesto. Justice (Maat) may be blind to the respect of persons but racist born nationalism, going all the way back to Thomas Jefferson and before, certainly isn't. Djehuti Sundaka PATRIOTIC POSTERS - WHITEHOUSE.ORG http://www.whitehouse.org/initiatives/posters/index.asp
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005